World Famous Physicist Says He’s ‘Found Evidence That God Exists’

Fact checked
When world famous theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claimed he has found evidence that God exists, his reasoning caused a stir in the scientific community.

When world famous theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claimed he has found evidence that God exists, his reasoning caused a stir in the scientific community.

When responding to a question about the meaning of life and God, Kaku surprised his interviewer when he revealed that most top physicists do believe in a God because of how the universe is designed. Ours is a universe of order, beauty, elegance and simplicity.

He explained the universe didn’t have to be this way — it could have been ugly and chaotic. In short, the order we see in the universe is evidence of a Creator.

I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence,” the physicist said to Science World Report.

Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exist in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”

WesternJournal report: Kaku, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory, came to his conclusions with what he calls “primitive semi-radius tachyons,” which are theoretical particles that have the ability to “unstick” matter or the vacuum space between particles, leaving everything in the universe free from any influence from the surrounding universe.

The physicist explained that God is like a mathematician, which is similar to what Albert Einstein believed.

This idea isn’t new for Kaku.

In an article for Big Think, he wrote that his String Theory was based on the idea that we are “reading the mind of God.

Watch Kaku in a video explaining his theory below:




Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry

46 Comments

  1. Kaku is fucked up on drugs.
    If there was a god then there wouldn’t be any muzzrats, or homosexuals on the planet.

  2. The opposite of a Divine Intelligence/Power is chaos, as in an atomic explosion.

    Yin/Yang…….male/female………..good/evil………….chaos/order.

    Cannot have one without the other.

    Trafficking in children, and consuming them…………now, that’s EVIL……….cannot we all agree on that.

    If EVIL exists, then GOD is there to contrast it. Now that I am seeing so much evidence of EVIL in the world, I believe in GOD even more than I ever have.

    EVIL cannot defeat GOOD…..but, you must have both, unfortunately.

    • Very true, god gave us the free will to choose, if there is no evil, there is no choice, and without a choice we are no different than the animals god gave us.

          • humans share 99.9 percent of their genome sequence with each other most scientific studies. say we share 98.5% of our DNA with chimpanzees our closest genetic relative. but what about a banana humans share approximately 60 percent of their DNA with banana plants.

          • And that banana has more sentience than you do. It’s easy to be a denier. There are no atheists in foxholes.

          • google shows About 46,200,000 results (0.63 seconds)
            once you read the first 1000 of them, get back to me

    • Wasn’t like that in the beginning though as man had everything he needed for a happy fulfilling never ending life.
      Evil–sin ONLY came into existence as a result of Adam and Eve disconnecting from their source of life Jehovah God.

        • i guess 7.5 billion souls living on a small rock floating in space surrounded by millions of other planets, galaxies and dimensions is not a fairy tale , Its science fiction Right? Are you really that arrogant not to see that “Everything that was created , was created in harmony” and that Chaos was created to balance that harmony . You should grow up and listen

          • couldn’t have put it better if i tried. As you noted, 1 small rock, surrounded by trillions not millions of other small rocks, and its not a fairy tale, and its highly likely there is life on some of those other rocks. Since the god you speak of was only believed of in 1 very small patch of this small rock for a 1000 years, and had no effect outside that arena, its seems highly illogical or even possible that the rest of the planet, and every other viable rock is not part of this so-called plan.
            So, either that god doesn’t exist, or you’re so arrogant that you believe you are the sole receiver of all that gods attention.
            Which one is it?

  3. Michio Kaku “big liar” hallucinating about god. So I thing is a good chance for him to stop creating false stories and theories about universe and other nonsense just for money.

  4. Many don’t want to acknowledge the existence of God because they don’t want to be held accountable for the debauched lifestyles they lead.
    They support Satan’s original claim at the rebellion in Eden namely that men are better off deciding for themselves what is good and what is bad and thereby not in need of God’s interference in their lives.
    Has the 6000 years + that have transpired since then given credence to that claim? You would have to be in total denial to not be able to answer that question instantly.

    • Many don’t see any evidence of gods or magic. Many see gods because of their OWN debauched past, looking for forgiveness or special dispensation, or anything that negates their own responsibility for past mistakes. Happily, science proves again and again that magic is a name given to things too complicated for some brains to comprehend. Once understood mechanically, the magic becomes just so much superstition, to be burned on the pile with all the other mistaken attributed magical beings like unicorns, Zeus and the wee folk. The mentally-challenged will always go to the easy answers and stop there. The inquisitive brain moves past the magical and looks for the mechanical doings, so as to really understand what’s REALLY happening, as opposed to making up or believing in stories that fit in a goofy but magically delicious (and unpredictable) way.

      ANYHOO, after 2 seconds searching on the google, I found this:

      Michio Kaku: There is a website that quoted me incorrectly. That’s one of the drawbacks of being in a public sphere: sometimes you get quoted incorrectly. And the reference I saw said that I said that you can prove the existence of God. My point of view is different. My own point of view is that you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God.

      Science is based on what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. That’s called science. However, there are certain things that are not testable, not reproducible, and not falsifiable. And that would include the existence of God.

      For example, look at reincarnation. If somebody at a cocktail party says that they are Cleopatra or Julius Caesar, how do you disprove that?

      How do you falsify that? Well, you ask some simple question and they get it wrong. Then you say, “Ha! I falsified your statement.” And they say, “No, the history books are wrong…How do I know the history books are wrong? Because I am Cleopatra. I am Julius Caesar.”

      At that point, the conversation is over. You begin to realize that no matter how you falsify that statement they can come back and say, “No, no, no, the history books are wrong.” And, how do you falsify that? You cannot. So, there are certain statements that are not falsifiable.

      Same thing with the existence of God. I don’t think there’s any one experiment that you can create to prove or disprove the existence of God. Therefore, it’s not a falsifiable statement. You cannot create an experiment that disproves the existence of God. Therefore, it’s a non-falsifiable statement.

      • This is terribly wrongheaded. 1. How do you falsify (in your terms, scientifically/empirically via experiment) that Cleopatra or Caesar even existed?! 2. The kind of evidence required depends entirely on the subject matter being investigated. God is NOT a scientific subject proper (the classical conception of God [contra the polytheism of the Greeks, Romans etc] is that God is TRANSCENDENT ie, utterly distinct, separate, above nature and the natural [the province of science]). The best we could do is to look at the scientific data and follow the evidence, where it points–it cant prove or disprove God. The position of Einstein, Kaku et al. is basically this, when they looked at the universe, they didnt just see a mechanism of laws, matter, stuff (as committed naturalist/atheist do today). They saw a “superior reasoning power” (Einstein) manifested in the very structure of the universe, a Mind at work, an Intelligence. Einstein’s rejection of classic Judeo-Christian theism is not based on science but on philosophical and theological grounds (he was A determinist, and he didn’t like interventions; he didn’t like interventions even from his own wife!). See Walter Isaacson’s EINSTEIN: HIS LIFE AND THE UNIVERSE. Recently, world renowned atheist Anthony Flew gave up his atheism on basically similar grounds. Another atheist who is not afraid to break ranks is Tom Nagel in his MIND AND COSMOS: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. And no, it’s not an argument from ignorance. On the contrary, it’s an argument from what we DO know about intelligence and its manifestations. The intelligent structure of life and the universe is more probable/expected/ predicted in a theistic rather than an atheistic worldview. As Paul Davies (agnostic theoretical physicist) said, there is no reason why the universe is orderly; there’s more reason to think that the universe would just be a jumble of chaos. But it’s not; it’s beautiful and elegant. That requires a COHERENT explanation. So, on which worldview is this to be expected–theism (a Creative Mind) or in naturalism (blind forces plus time plus chance)? The answer is obvious for any unbiased observer.

      • “To be burned on the pile with all the other mistaken attributed magical beings like unicorns, Zeus and the wee folk”—-Anytime you see this kind of childish mentality comments, is that this person is not interested in an argument for truth respectively , just insulting based on presumptions that fit their worldview free of accountability because they equivocate autonomy for freedom…………….move on, shake the dust of your feet.

        There is a difference between atheism and anti theist

      • Creation, evolution, the big bang, abiogenesis, etc. These are all things that people believed happened in history. None of these are testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. All anyone can do is to look at data and evidence and interpret it to support their views.

    • I grew up catholic, that’s not the lords prayer at all, totally butchered. Also, you’re just making that up, I guess you haven’t given it any thought. I want to live forever, you think I want to die? I want to ignore a god because I want to do things he tells me not to, like eat shellfish and wear clothes of differing fabrics? You think you can ignore those laws and still get into heaven? You obviously agree men can decide what is good and bad. I feel bad for you man, always having to fight beliefs in your head all the time

      • Since you’re a catholic I will give the same 2 verses from the King James version Matthew 6:9,10 “9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.10 Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven” (KJV)
        Any one who can’t agree that God’s original will and purpose was to put our first parents in Eden to enjoy (unending) life here on earth , a purpose Jesus alluded to in the Lord’s prayer as being done one day, is tuned into some other non biblical teachings.
        As to the mosaic law with it’s dietary laws and codes, it was nailed to the tree Jesus was nailed to and no longer in force.
        Jesus himself stated that love is the laws fulfillment . If you love God with all your heart ,soul, and mind and your neighbor as yourself, you would be automatically fulfilling the law since love does not work evil to ones neighbor. Jesus condemned the religious leaders of his day about the washing of hands, the strict sabbath rules, as well as all the other ceremonies and customs they were unable to keep perfectly.
        As for beliefs in my head that you say I’m fighting with all the time, thats rubbish , as all my beliefs are bible based and harmonious with same.

        I don’t come to these forums to change anybodies mind but rather to plant seeds of truth that may in time grow under the right conditions.

        Good fortune to you on your journey brother.

    • I am Christian and I usually do not approve of this attack on people’s lifestyles. Who are we to judge others and their lives. You see to be thinking like those Evanglicals who see the devil everywhere. Please beware that this may not be the case and we have so many cases where people were going to the Temple, stating a lot of laws and were not loving their neighbours (adn accumulating guns to shoot the first to trespass). Everyone has his or her conscience and they will have to answer to God only and they may be doing much more then you think. We all have our problems and we are Our goal is to talk about the beauty of God’s plan and how everything is based on LOVE. If you want to convince people to accept God, do not speak about sin as you may misse the point. The KIngdom of Jesus is about LOVE and means getting the people to live together in harmony and meaningflul relationships. Lets first listen to their own holy history as Jean Vanier used to say: everyone may have an experience of God that is worth listening too.

  5. I think it’s unfortunate that physicists feel compelled to express their universal feelings through the “God” concept, unfortunate because the vast majority of the world’s population have been conditioned to respond to that concept in a childish way — meaning, of course, an anthropomorphic God.

    For some people, including Einstein, the word God is a permissible shortcut, not to be taken literally. Michio Kaku’s “proof” of the existence of God is no more or less a proof than Spinoza’s was. It is a belief and I believe it should be expressed as such. The statement,

    God is expressed in the beauty and harmony of the universe

    is a tautology, conveying no more information than,

    Gee, I wonder how all this happened.

    • 14 But a physical man does not accept the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot get to know them, because they are examined spiritually. 1Corinthians 2:14
      If God doesn’t exist as you intimate, then your future will be determined by the wims of men who don’t have your interests at heart.
      A bleak and fitting end for those living in denial of Jehovah God .

    • “tautology”? Um, no. When Einstein looked at the universe, he didnt just see a mechanism of laws, matter, stuff (as committed naturalist/atheist do today). He saw what he called a “superior reasoning power” manifested in the very structure of the universe. He saw Mind at work. He saw Intelligence. His rejection of classic Judeo-Christian theism is not based on science but on philosophical and theological grounds (he was a determinist, and he didn’t like interventions; he didn’t like interventions even from his own wife!). See Walter Isaacson’s EINSTEIN: HIS LIFE AND THE UNIVERSE. Recently, world renowned atheist Anthony Flew gave up his atheism on basically similar grounds. Another atheist who is not afraid to break ranks is Tom Nagel in his MIND AND COSMOS: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. And no, it’s nto an argument from ignorance. On the contrary, it’s an argument from what we DO know about intelligence and its manifestations. The intelligent structure of life and the universe is more probable/expected/predicted in a theistic rather than an atheistic worldview.

  6. There were many noted scientist’s who believed in God, that He had to exist. Some of these were Einstein, Pasteur, Galileo, Marconi, Isaac Newton, Faraday, Copernicus, and Kelvin to name a few.
    “Psalms 19:1 “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork” (ESV)

    • what?….
      Einstein had NO gods
      Copernicus was slated by the church for heliocentric ideas (sorry about the big word)}
      Galileo pretended to be a believer but he was really a convinced atheist. Galileo was convinced that Divine Providence could not miss nor disregard anything to do with the government of human affairs,

      really…you are simply gibbering nonsense that you would prefer to be true.

      • That may be as I pulled that information off the web however the fact remains that the universe from the micro to the macro are intelligently designed and follow precise laws of physics and to deny an intelligent Creator smacks of severe mental retardation.

        • ok…i can understand that the beauty and precision are exemplary, and a wonderful thing, but inside that apparently perfect machinery are problems that we actually carry ourselves, like our unequal length vagus nerves, trapped under our heart and aorta as we evolved from a fish type creature to mammals, or our vas deferens, on the wrong side of the pelvic bone back up to the testicles, or the human eye, with inherent myopia, and astigmatism, the photoreceptor cells of the retina are facing
          backwards, with the wiring facing the light…its built backwards. Thats before we even do into all the problems with dna, and its disease carrying ability, poor reproduction mechanism, resulting in many genetic problems as we age. The sun emits particles that actually kill us, the very thing we need for energy is a killing machine.
          Once you go over the litany of problems we survive within, then its more obviously a case of luck and survival, and not gods and design.

          • Thy sun emits particles that actually kill us. But the Earth was designed with the Van Hallen belt and that is why animals can exist. So, the Universe has built many regulating loops which can lead to improvements. The meteorites carry the lves fo seeding other planets and they came to eliminate the dinosaurs are the right time so humans can evolve. Then dinosaurs were receding into lovely birds. If this is not beauty and logic from a mind, I cannot give that to a dice throw. The Universe is not the result of chance.

            But, everyhting on Earth seem to have been placed to allow life to exist and lead to intelligence in the way Teilhard de Chardin has suggested it.

            Mars will not populated by humans because we cannot fly there safely without getting burned by solar flares. Until we can make large spaceships with force fields around them, we will not be able to leave Earth.

  7. Newpunch is a massive pile of steaming crap. Michio Kaku says nothing like “there is a god”. and the description of “spirituality” is nothing like implied.

  8. Michio Kaku knows very well that in the scientific world, we believe in irrefutable evidence proving your theory. Before uttering this nonsense, he must first prove his theory. Otherwise he is no different from theists who believe shit based on faith alone.

    • Evolution, Big Bang, abiogenesis, have not nor can they be proven by irrefutable evidence. All anyone can do is present data and explain why they believe it supports their theory.

  9. These scientist must be really stupid! The most common people have known that God exists for thousands of years!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.