US Supreme Court Rules Iran Must Pay $2 Billion To Terror Victims

The US Supreme Court has upheld a judgment allowing families of victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism to collect nearly $2 billion in compensation.

The court ruled 6-2 in favor of relatives of the 241 Marines who died in a 1983 terrorist attack in Beirut and victims of other attacks that the courts also linked to Tehran.

The issue however, is not whether Iran should pay, but whether Congress has infringed upon the territory of the judiciary by essentially awarding damages.

RT reports:

On Wednesday, the court ruled that Congress had acted within its powers when it passed a law in 2012 that granted victims involved in the case the right to be paid for their losses out of frozen funds tied to Iran’s central bank.

The legislation stated that the bank’s assets within the US were to be turned over to the families of the victims.

Iran’s central bank tried to stave off court orders at the time, complaining that US Congress was intruding into the business of federal courts when it passed the legislation, according to AP.

Over 1,300 people are among the relatives of the victims of the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and other attacks.

The plaintiffs, led by Deborah Peterson, whose brother, Lance Cpl. James C. Knipple, was killed in the Lebanese capital in 1983, accused Iran of providing material support to militants responsible for the bombing that killed 241 US service members. According to US media, the plot was later traced to Hezbollah, a militant and political group that originated in Lebanon in 1982.

In a combined case, the plaintiffs sued to hold Iran liable for orchestrating the attacks. Congress entered into the dispute after passing the law to help the American plaintiffs gain hold of Iranian funds.

Congress has repeatedly changed the legislation in the past 20 years to allow victims to sue over state-sponsored terrorism while federal courts have ruled for the victims.

Iran’s Bank Markazi argued that Congress exceeded its authority and unlawfully changed the law aimed specifically at the case while it was pending in the courts.