US Scientists Use Gain Of Function Research to Create New Covid Strain With 80% Kill Rate

Fact checked

Boston University scientists have created a lethal new Covid-19 strain in a biolaboratory that boasts an 80% kill rate, according to reports.

The scientists were condemned for ‘playing with fire’ after it emerged they had created the deadly new Covid strain using gain of function research.

DailyMail.com revealed the team had made a hybrid virus — combining Omicron and the original Wuhan strain — that killed 80 per cent of mice in a study.

The revelation exposes how dangerous virus manipulation research continues to go on even in the US, despite fears similar practices may have started the pandemic.

Daily Mail report: Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: ‘This should be totally forbidden, it’s playing with fire.’

Gain of function research – when viruses are purposefully manipulated to be more infectious or deadly – is thought to be at the center of Covid’s origin.

A Chinese laboratory located just miles from the first cluster of cases carried out similar research on bat coronaviruses.

But the practice has been largely restricted in the US since 2017. 

Dr Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, said: ‘The research is a clear example of gain of function research.

He added: ‘If we are to avoid a next lab-generated pandemic, it is imperative that oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research be strengthened.’

In the new research, which has not been peer-reviewed, a team of researchers from Boston and Florida extracted Omicron’s spike protein — the unique structure that binds to and invades human cells.

It has always been present in the virus but has become more evolved over time. Omicron has dozens of mutations on its spike protein that made it so infectious.

Researchers attached Omicron’s spike to the original wildtype strain that first emerged in Wuhan at the start of the pandemic.

The researchers looked at how mice fared against the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron variant.

When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard Omicron strain, however, they all survived and only experienced ‘mild’ symptoms. 

Writing in the paper, they said: ‘In…mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent.’

The researchers said it signaled that while the spike protein is responsible for infectivity, changes to other parts of its structure determine its deadliness.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry

30 Comments

  1. I am thinking this was accidentally discovered and then ‘leaked’ to make it sound like it was created to fight the battle of a future strain. The globalists want us dea-d and this was likely an actual bioweapon deployable strain. Thank Fauci and his types who work with the deep state

    • BAC wards thought 911 letters full of killer bio proven to have been built on campus in the USA.I knew the first one killed by them

    • Peter Daszak publicly talked about his work on creating pandemic viruses back in 2016, right on TV. They don’t even need to “leak” it for some kind of spin, they just openly talk about the fúcked up shít they do.

      Kind of like Yuval Noah Harari from the WEF openly talking about how they don’t need 95% of us peasants, or Bill Gates “predicting” new pandemics with an evil smirk on his face. They ooze hubris from their pores. They laugh in our face and do whatever they want.

  2. FENTANYL IS THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN AMERICANs from the age of 18-48 Most coming into america from CHINA via mexico.Than the covid,CHINA is at war with US so yea our lab coats are trying to play22 catch22up but that is just more MADD>VS<MADD/NESS!!!

  3. I call B.S. on this. See Karen Kingston interview on Stew Peters show on Red Voice Media – she proves coovid is not a virus it is A. I. with nano particles. mRNA is NOT transmissable.

    • GENERA BETA CORONAVIRUS is NOT MOD-RNA it is a RNA based based virus that when seen in humans is the human beta coronaviruse-It`s genome has been around for 100,000 of years in fish and in bats so on and on and on.The MODifed RNA reduces it`s effectives.MODified RNA was first used in humans with last stage AID`s and even than the side effects were so BAD it was`nt used much after it`s trial runs

    • While mod RNA may not be transmissable ? CORONAVIRUS is not modifed and is transmissable even from FISH slime.The covid virus from CHINa had 100,000s of years in bat poop to built up it`s GENOMIC stuctures and even advanced in the LAB`s doing their bioengineering.FENTANYL is the leading cause of death in mareica in the age group of 18-48 and most of that comes from china also.It`s pay back TIME for china as the brits did the same thing to them with the DOPE wars on china ages ago and china see`s america as just a back drop of the UK&EU.War upstages slowly in most history`s of war

      • You present no evidence, no source and no credentials but you expect us to believe you? I’m married to a virologist/immunologist with 55 yrs research behind him, he has vetted this entire video and says the science holds up. Karen Kingston is a Biotech data analyst, pharmaceutical expert and ex-Pfizer employee and presents evidence in this video that. What evidence have you got that she’s wrong? Have you even seen the video?

        • A.I run nano or nano smart interactives with A.I.While smart nano meds have been around awhile A.I being broadcast? could and do interact in some cases I`ve seen those LAbs and been around those TEST subjects.If all of covid? or modifed RNA`s are nano partics than WTF is single strand covid 19? corona.ALL- RIBON NUCLEIC ACID (RNA)!

        • A.I is not bio tech just as nano is not bio either.You have one little bliff on this subject and want everyone to chase your story line.IF they had A.I that was running the NANO partics what would be their PATHOGENESIS? as a worldwide LAB would have to see NANO particals EVERYWHERE without any viruse pathogenics.PLUS the A.I would also have to be broadcast worldwide-it would be a huge undertaking of the scale and scope of which the world has never had or seen.I`am not saying that it isn`t possible but it seems super unlikely as a lab of that SCALE of worldwide would see to many factors that could`nt be controlled to even call it a LAB,

        • A GOOD SUBJECT can you back it with more INFO tham I`am married to or they said.What A.I what nano partic what makes it possible-I think they will one day take this road on this scale? MAYBE- but from what I have witnessed they only have a few test subjects mostly in jail to play GAD with

        • plus the labs in china would leave us in the stone age and CHINA has the %ONE killer in america already FENTENYL most american labs are totally limited in scope&scale by funding

          • Read my post again – I NEVER CLAIMED VIRUSES DON’T EXIST, I did say my husband is a virologist – you know one who studies VIRUSES, why would I think they don’t exist???? What I did say is that I don’t think covid is a virus, it’s A.I. nano particles. You seem to think saying mean things makes you right. Youhave now been BLOCKED.

          • Yes by why would a virologist be studying A.I or nano PARTICLES?.COVID is a virus but are you saying they built a fake BIO weapon?.Very INTERESTING SUBJECT matter.SEEN smart NANO MEDs in actions& know AF&A.I also.EVERYONE in the army is a test subject thats why we wear DOG TAGS& so on!

          • The virology part of it adds is what my husband said. The immune system apparently sees the nano particles as parasites (which is why that is what some people are calling it “artificial parasites”) so that is why ivermectin worked on getting rid of covid. Hope this answers your question. I do know about test subjects in military – stay safe my friend.

          • The Vax has nano particals for sure most likely smart& interactive but I`ve never heard anyone say the covid is JUST nano`s controlled by A.I what could be its pathogen?

          • Maybe a misunderstanding? a BIO-weapon fake virus made of smart nano& smart particals&A.I control by RF made to look and act like a known virus a HYBRED atomic scale BIO weapon?.IT IS POSSIBLE from what I have studied geno`s grafted to NANO bio partics and smart MICRO interactives with wireless&super computers way way smarter than humans now

  4. SARS-CORONAVIRUS is seen in all warm blooded vertebrates,whales,bovine,goose,feline,ferret,rat,swine and the pig herds around the open markets in china saw PIG herds wiped out by it and it`s last stage`s also-SADS

  5. It’s to Incorporate everyone so they’re all under the spell of one Magi.
    Scientist is a word that isn’t English, it’s an ancient language and means in English sorcerer witch wizard. They’re witches and they make potions and they write spells which they call laws, acts, orders, etc that create magical reactions.
    They’re all in it together.

  6. There should be a whole lot of people going to jail, THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW! Signed into law during 1990. “Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989” which clearly states “—Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent,
    toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a
    foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this
    title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is
    extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.” It also defines gain of function which is forbidden. While developed as a weapon, merely created a 80% kill rate virus is a weapon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.