A British Supreme Court judge has slammed the UK government as “control freaks” for imposing draconian rules on people under the guise of COVID, and labeled it “morally and constitutionally indefensible” to define what freedoms the public can and can’t have.
In an op-ed published Sunday, Lord Sumpton warned that the “debate about whether to let us have a family Christmas perfectly sums up what is wrong with this Government’s handling” of the pandemic.
Sumption wrote that there are “many different answers to the dilemmas of a Covid Christmas”, yet the crux of the matter is “whether we should be allowed to make the choice for ourselves, instead of having it imposed on us by law.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
“But for the Jacobins of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and the control freaks in the Department of Health, theirs is the only answer,” Sumption warned.
Summit.news reports: The British government has posited allowing people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas, but with the caveat that in January they will have to pay back the privilege with more lockdown time, specifically another 25 days.
Lord Sumption, who served as a senior judge on the Supreme Court of the UK between between 2012 and 2018, slammed the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, suggesting he is engaging in “public relations management” rather than leadership.
“Boris Johnson knows that restrictions over Christmas would be deeply unpopular, widely ignored and catastrophic for the retail and hospitality industries,” Sumption asserted.
“So he will soon announce their temporary suspension, behaving as if our lives belonged to the state and Christmas was an act of indulgence on his part,” the judge added.
Sumption further wrote that “control freaks and the rest of the sackcloth and ashes brigade will demand a payback” afterwards, claiming that some “are already pressing for two, three or even five days of extra lockdown for every day of release over Christmas. ”
Sumption proclaimed that the state is exercising an “insistence on coercing the entire population,” saying it is “morally and constitutionally indefensible in a country which is not yet a totalitarian state, like China.”
“The Government has not earned our trust. Sooner or later, people will take back control of their own lives and do the right thing, whatever Ministers say,” he predicted.
Sumption’s comments come in the wake of reports that the UK government is planning to issue ‘freedom passes’ for people who agree to vaccination or twice testing negative for the virus in one week.
Niamh Harris
The burden of proof that Covid 19 is a NOVEL virus is on the government. They failed to prove this virus is novel any more than any other seasonal cold or flu.
The burden of proof is also on the government to demonstrate that the health impacts on the people rise to the level of “pandmeic”
They have not.
“Science” without peer review is academic dictatorship. Where is the public, open debate? Where are the counter arguments?
Therefore, you can conclude the the covid 19 situation was a planned psyop run by none other than the CIA.
The only conclusion to make, is that this situation is managed by the CIA and the CIA is the enemy of the people. There is NO other conclusion. CIA=Criminals In America
CIA = ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE
They are Satanists. Or idiot bribed corrupted servants of Satanists or they are just plain stupid beyond belief.
Such lists Our news jyst qbjoyncex that Australia will have a choice of 3 vaccines that manufacturers claim ,just by coincidence to have the same ” success ” rate as we all know is the percentages of the people that covid is harmless to anyway Anything from an 80 to 95 % success rate .Course our government wants the cheapest option with an 80 % ” success ” rate 20 % of people harmed or killed by the vaccines ok for them That’s a risk worth taking Its not like every life matters now Not in the vaccine situation .