Two African American teenage girls have been charged with felony murder after killing an Uber driver in DC during an armed carjacking.
Instead of fleeing the scene, the girls were caught on camera calmly looking for their cellphone inside the vehicle right next to the victim’s dead body.
The girls are only 13 and 15 years old
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: Their Pakistani victim, Mohammad Anwar, 66, of Springfield, Virginia, was driving for Uber Eats when the girls attempted to steal his car and tased him.
The horrific scene was caught on camera by a witness.
Warning, the video is extremely graphic and disturbing:
The incident took place on Tuesday and murder charges were announced on Wednesday.
“We are devastated by this tragic news and our hearts go out to Mohammad’s family during this difficult time,” an Uber spokesperson said, according to affiliate WTOP. “We’re grateful the suspects have been arrested and thank the Metropolitan Police Department for their diligence with this investigation.”
Niamh Harris
See that’s not normal They are really insane psychopaths to do that But the Courts won’t agree They will say they’re just bad girls and they will be free in no time at all ,most likely and they know it . And its really because if music The publishing houses if music .The devils tool which was always originally banned in both Christian and Islamic law .
And guess who runs the music industry and the movie and the news media and more.
Felony murder is murder. They are both guilty, with no defenses and no mitigation, and caught on tape. An innocent hard-working grandfather is dead, his family devastated. Life imprisonment for both of them.
Death penalty.
OK, I would go along with you, but SCOTUS has abolished the DP for juveniles. The 13-year-old probably has some law that favors shortening her sentence too, although I object to it and call for her to be tried as an adult.
Is there a death penalty in D.C.?
I disagree. They will be put in prison and will stay there. The prison industial complex will just make money off them.
Depraved monsters with the violence gene. Yes it is real.
and if they were hanged publicly (not behind prison walls with only a few select people to assure their deaths), it would decrease occurrences like these,
and there is no question of putting innocent people to death, is there?
Don’t make the black kids angry!
put them down like the rabid animals they are…
Meanwhile, somewhere in the British Empire, an uncivili*z*ed snowflake is melting.
Here is another heinous act of black violence, in Midtown Manhattan. A little Asian woman is on her way to church. A big stocky balding black man coming from the opposite direction kicks her down onto the sidewalk while people watch. Then he begins stomping on her, over and over again. “Fuck you,” he says. “You don’t belong here.”
The whole thing is caught on tape as 3 black men in the hotel watch the brutality unfold through the big windows and do nothing. It’s Kitty Genovese redux. One of the men even goes to the door and shuts it, as if to be rid of the old woman’s suffering. Zero empathy.
You want to know more about it? The assailant was arrested, and just as I suspected, he has a history of violence. He murdered his own mother and did time for it in the penitentiary. He was, unfortunately for civilized society, paroled in 2019 and lived in a shelter nearby. His name is Brandon Elliott.
Why should it matter if the girls were black? Why would you put that in the title of the article as though it’s meant to mean something bigger than it is? It is indeed very sad and appalling that this happened, but these two girls are disgusting monsters, irrespective of their skin colour. And judging some of the below comments, articles written like this only fuel the hatred towards minority groups even more. Please reconsider changing the title of the article. My thoughts go with the poor man’s family, what a very sad and tragic loss of life by the hands of disgusting, morally-deprived youths!
Who would say they are morally deprived? They may have been catechized with moral teachings and lessons in morality… and still morally depraved. The world is full of psychopaths and sociopaths. The enormity of their depravity is demonstrated by their walking about looking for a cellphone without paying one bit of attention to Mohammad Anwar lying there nearby dying in a heap. That is blood-curdling!
They are morally deprived because they committed something immoral. Therefore, they are deprived of morals… I thought that was obvious.
Where in TH did you get your English?
definition of “deprived” — adjective marked by deprivation; lacking the necessities of life, as adequate food and shelter: a
childhood. Then you insult the Queen’s English again by saying they “committed something immoral,” which informs that they had morality and specifically intended to violate it. In fact, what they did was amoral, not immoral. It was unconscionable and base… a crime of evil and turpitude.
If I am deprived, that means someone has taken something away from me that I deserve, such as love and affection, a safe place to sleep, or food.
Of course you would pick apart my English, because it distracts you from the original point I was making – which was, in case you forgot, about why it was important to include “black girls” in the title of the article. Anyway, if you saw the second definition of deprived just below that same one that you cited, you would have read: “(of a person) lacking a specified benefit that is considered important.” Morals are beneficial and important, and these girls have none. Therefore, these girls are morally deprived. But please, do keep continuing strawmanning.
Such a wacky Canadian with poor English, and now you’re misusing the word “distracts.” I’m definitely not distracted, but I’m going to let you loose now, Wacky. You will get the last word, such words as you will invariably misuse. These two little black girls are not deprived. Deprivation is something someone does to another. If one has morality, or honor, it cannot be taken away. It is something you give yourself, and it cannot be seized from you. You cannot be deprived of it. These two have no empathy, no superego. Am I depriving you of making a fool of yourself? “Strawmanning,” that’s a good one. LOL. You run along now. Take a Xanax and a nap. I am glad I found this site. However, it does attract wacks like yourself.
I’m not Canadian, but thanks for the assumption. Good to know you insult people instead of actually engaging in any polite, civilised intellectual conversation. Does it make you feel like a big boy, dragging your knuckles around the internet when you see an opinion you don’t like? And people like you call others the snowflakes when you can’t even have a simple polite discourse – the irony is hilarious as well as delicious. By the way, literally no dictionary definition backs up anything you’re saying – for example, what about sleep deprivation? Sleep deprivation isn’t always caused by someone else taking your sleep away from you. You can still be deprived of sleep despite it not being “something someone does to another”. Speaking of such, perhaps it’s you that needs the nap. And yes, strawmanning is indeed a “good one” because that’s exactly what you’re doing by definition – and you love the good old dictionary definitions, right?