Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said in a statement:
“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.“
The lawsuit argued there was a violation of the guarantee of “equal protection under the law” after counties where voters were primarily Democrats used alternative methods to vote than counties where voters were primarily Republican.
On Saturday, U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann dismissed the suit “with prejudice,” issuing a rebuke to the Trump campaign for attempting to “disenfranchise almost seven million voters.”
One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened.
Breitbart.com reports: Ellis and Giuliani argued that their evidence showed that 682,777 ballots in Pennsylvania were cast illegally, after poll workers denied the Republican party’s right to independent review, and said they wished to present their evidence in court.
“This is just an extension of the Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know,” they wrote.
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- UK Government Is Adding Fluoride To The Drinking Water - September 24, 2021
- Switzerland: Police Fire Rubber Bullets At Covid Passport Protesters In Swiss Capital - September 24, 2021
- Israel Says Unvaxxed, Untested Teachers Won’t Be Able To Teach & Won’t Get Paid - September 24, 2021