Supreme Court Grants Texas State the Right to Use Strict Voter ID Law in Next Election.
The New York Times reports today:
‘The Supreme Court on Saturday allowed Texas to use its strict voter identification law in the November election. The court’s order, issued just after 5 a.m., was unsigned and contained no reasoning.
The law, enacted in 2011, requires voters seeking to cast their ballots at the polls to present photo identification like a Texas driver’s or gun license, a military ID or a passport.
Those requirements, Justice Ginsburg wrote, “may prevent more than 600,000 registered Texas voters (about 4.5 percent of all registered voters) from voting in person for lack of compliant identification.”
“A sharply disproportionate percentage of those voters are African-American or Hispanic,” she added, adding that “racial discrimination in elections in Texas is no mere historical artifact.”’
Required Identification for Voting in Person in Texas
According to the official VoteTexas.gov website:
Voters are now required to present an approved form of photo identification in order to vote in all Texas Elections.
Acceptable forms of identification include:
- Texas driver license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
- Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
- Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
- Texas concealed handgun license issued by DPS
- United States military identification card containing the person’s photograph
- United States citizenship certificate containing the person’s photograph
- United States passport
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has criticized the law calling it “openly racist”.
The LA Times reports:
‘Ginsburg’s colleagues voted 6-3 to allow the Texas law to remain in effect for the upcoming election. But as she observed in a scathing dissent issued Saturday, the measure may prevent more than 600,000 registered voters, or 4.5% of the total, from voting in person for lack of accepted identification. “A sharply disproportionate percentage of those voters are African-American or Hispanic,” she wrote.
The law’s intent is “purposely discriminatory,” Ginsburg concluded. Citing the U.S. District Court ruling that declared the Texas law unconstitutional, she observed that since 2000, Texas has become a majority-minority state. That gave its Legislature and governor “an evident motive to ‘gain partisan advantage by suppressing'” the votes of blacks and Latinos.’
What do you think about the requirement for Texans needing ID at the elections? Comment below the article.
Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)
- State Department Tells Court to REJECT Hillary Clinton’s Shameless Appeal to Avoid Testimony - April 7, 2020
- Vatican Treasurer George Pell Released From Prison; Child Rape Charges Quashed by High Court - April 7, 2020
- Alyssa Milano Says Joe Biden Sex Assault Claim Deserves Due Process: ‘I Still Endorse Him’ - April 7, 2020