Sir David Attenborough has trashed the idea of sending food aid to starving people in famine-ridden countries and has urged for more debate about population control.
The veteran broadcaster warned that the world was “heading for disaster” soon due to the “threat” of overpopulation.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
Independent.co.uk reports: He said that unless human beings do not act soon the “natural world will do something”.
Putin Delivers Biden an Almighty Slap: 'Don’t Blame Me For Inflation'
Nestle CEO: Humans Do NOT Have a Right to Water, Should Be Privatized and Controlled
World Economic Forum To “Freeze Bank Accounts” of Meat Eaters To "Educate Them”
Biden Announces a New Plandemic Right before the Midterm Elections
Proof of Time Travel? These Famous Faces Appear Throughout History
Putin Declares Victory Over New World Order: 'Humanity Has Woken Up'
Mass Cattle Deaths Are an ‘Inside Job’ Designed To Cause Food Shortages in America
Christina Aguilera Performs For Kids Wearing GIGANTIC Strap-On
Angelina Jolie Admits to ‘Gruesome Illuminati Blood Rituals’
He added that the natural world has been doing it “for a long time” and more discussion is needed.
Raising the example of Ethiopia, Sir David said that the famine there was down to there being “too many people for too little piece of land”.
Speaking ahead of his new series David Attenborough’s Rise of Animals, he suggested that humans are “blinding ourselves” to the problem, claiming, “We say, get the United Nations to send them bags of flour. That’s barmy”.
He cited “huge sensitivities” like the right to have children and the Catholic Church’s stance on contraception as barriers to talking about population control.
He added that the issue could also be misconstrued as an attack on poor people as the areas of concern are Africa and Asia.
Discussing comments he made on population control earlier this year, when he described human beings as a “plague on the Earth”, Sir David agreed they could be considered “blindlingly obvious,” but suggested that nobody else had made the point publicly.
“Just keep on about it. Just keep on about it,” he said, when asked by the paper about the next step to solving the problem. “You know and I know that there are huge, huge sensitivities involved in this.
“To start with, it is the individual’s great privilege to have children. And who am I to say that you shan’t have children? That’s one thing.
“Then the next thing is that there’s a religious one, in the sense that the Catholic Church doesn’t accept this. That you should control the population.”