Knowing About FEMA Camps Makes You A Criminal Now
People who are concerned with the truth about the world around them are now being labeled as potential terrorists according to an article from Natural News:
The United States was founded upon certain important principles — one of which guarantees its citizens the right to free speech.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
In the past couple of decades or so — particularly since 9/11 — Americans have witnessed this right being increasingly eroded. Authorities have begun identifying ordinary citizens as “potential terrorists” merely for having strong views and opinions regarding a number of topics.
WEF Anoint Charles ‘The Great Reset King’
WEF To Force Public To Wear ‘Brain Implants’ So the Elite Can Read Their Minds
Woody Harrelson Slams Big Pharma: 'The Last People You Should Trust With Your Health'
NASA Insider Confesses on Deathbed: I Filmed Fake Moon Landing in 1969
Disney’s ‘Little Demon’ Is Normalizing Satanism and Pedophilia for the Masses
Nostradamus Predicted 'Great Uprising' Against King Charles III
King Charles III Vows To Usher In ‘Great Reset’ Following Queen Elizabeth’s Death
Bill Gates’ Factory Breeding 30 Million Mosquitos Infected With ‘Infertility Bacteria’ Per Week
WEF Orders Journalists To ‘Cease and Desist’ Exposing Secret Globalist Agenda
For instance, if you are concerned about illegal immigration or oppose abortion, you may be labeled as a threat. The federal government has expanded its definitions of “extremism” and “potential terrorism” to include a wide range of people and their views — chances are that anyone reading this falls into at least one of these categories.
Michael Snyder of TheTruthWins.com has compiled a list of 72 types of people  classified in U.S. government documents as extremists or potential terrorists.
The documents include military training manuals  and memos ; terrorism training manuals for law enforcement ; guidelines from the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START)  and other sources.
Some of the types of people listed as potential threats include:
Members of the Patriot Movement
Those opposed to Agenda 21
Those concerned about FEMA camps
Those who support gun rights
Those who oppose abortion
Those concerned about communism
Those opposed to the “New World Order”
Those who visit “extremist” websites or blogs
This is just a partial list — in short, almost anyone who has deep-seated beliefs regarding almost any type of social, religious or political issue could be labeled as a potential terrorist by the government.
As Snyder observes:
At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. …
The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.
It’s obvious that the federal government takes these “threats” seriously — even when disguising their concerns in a seemingly lighthearted manner. In a recent article published by TheBlaze , John Whitehead examines the use of the “zombie” metaphor by various government agencies in their training drills:
For years now, the government has been carrying out military training drills with zombies as the enemy. …
The zombie exercises appear to be kitschy and fun–government agents running around trying to put down a zombie rebellion–but what if the zombies in the exercises are us, the citizenry, viewed by those in power as mindless, voracious, zombie hordes?
Whitehead notes that, by 2008, the government had compiled a list of more than 8 million names of Americans who are considered a threat to national security. The list is to be used “by the military in the event of a national catastrophe, a suspension of the Constitution or the imposition of martial law.” 
As Whitehead points out, the government is pursuing a strategy for countering what it perceives as threats by first “detecting” and subsequently neutralizing them:
If there is any lesson to be learned, it is simply this: whether the threat to national security comes in the form of actual terrorists, imaginary zombies or disgruntled American citizens infected with dangerous ideas about freedom, the government’s response to such threats remains the same: detect, deter and annihilate.
We are living in dangerous times — at least for those of us who are determined to exercise our right to free speech.
 http://info.publicintelligence.net [PDF]
 http://www.start.umd.edu [PDF]
Latest posts by Royce Christyn (see all)
- Government Op Who Predicted Super Bowl Score Warns Of Nuclear War - February 18, 2017
- Video: Why Voting Doesn’t Change Anything & Democracy Is A Lie - May 7, 2016
- Did Bible Verse Predict String of Recent Quakes, Volcano, & Foam? - April 17, 2016