Scientific Study: Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition

Fact checked
Massive scientific study confirms that twin towers was brought down by controlled demolition

A European scientific study has concluded that on September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition. 

The study, conducted by four physicists and published in Europhysics Magazine, says that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”

Wnd.com reports:

“Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude.

The study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries, and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.

Conscious of the controversial nature of the report Europhysics included an editor’s note with the study in the September 2016 issue: “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.”

In August 2002, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology launched what would become a six-year investigation of the three building failures that occurred on 9/11. It found both the Twin Towers, as well as the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane, all collapsed as a result of fires and intense heat. But even the NIST found that the three buildings were “the only known cases of total structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a significant role.”

“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11,” the researchers write. “Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001?”

The report also concluded: “Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”

The researchers also found “the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.”

They noted that “15 years after the event a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists are unconvinced by that explanation.”

Here are some of the observations the researchers offered:

  • Fires typically are not hot enough and do not last long enough in any single area to generate enough energy to heat the large structural members to the point where they fail (the temperature at which structural steel loses enough strength to fail is dependent on the factor of safety used in the design. In the case of WTC 7, for example, the factor of safety was generally 3 or higher. Here, 67 percent of the strength would need to be lost for failure to ensue, which would require the steel to be heated to about 660°C);
  • Most high-rises have fire suppression systems (water sprinklers), which further prevent a fire from releasing sufficient energy to heat the steel to a critical failure state;
  • Structural members are protected by fireproofing materials, which are designed to prevent them from reaching failure temperatures within specified time periods;
  • Steel-framed high-rises are designed to be highly redundant structural systems. Thus, if a localized failure occurs, it does not result in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure. Throughout history, three steel-framed high-rises are known to have suffered partial collapses due to fires; none of those led to a total collapse. Countless other steel-framed high-rises have experienced large, long-lasting fires without suffering either partial or total collapse. In addition to resisting ever-present gravity loads and occasional fires, high-rises must be designed to resist loads generated during other extreme events – in particular, high winds and earthquakes.

The physicists also note the Towers were specifically designed to withstand the impact and destructive force of airliners crashes.

They write:” The total collapse of WTC 7 at 5:20 pm on 9/11, is remarkable because it exemplified all the signature features of an implosion: The building dropped in absolute free fall for the first 2.25 seconds of its descent over a distance of 32 meters or eight stories. Its transition from stasis to free fall was sudden, occurring in approximately one-half second. It fell symmetrically straight down. Its steel frame was almost entirely dismembered and deposited mostly inside the building’s footprint, while most of its concrete was pulverized into tiny particles. Finally, the collapse was rapid, occurring in less than seven seconds. Given the nature of the collapse, any investigation adhering to the scientific method should have seriously considered the controlled demolition hypothesis, if not started with it. Instead, NIST (as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which conducted a preliminary study prior to the NIST investigation) began with the predetermined conclusion that the collapse was caused by fires.”

The original investigations did note: “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.”

On March 2006, the NIST’s lead investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder, was quoted as saying, “Truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”

“The collapse mechanics discussed above are only a fraction of the available evidence indicating that the airplane impacts and ensuing fires did not cause the collapse of the Twin Towers,” the report says. “Videos show that the upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video shows the upper sections that purportedly descended all the way to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs also show numerous high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from point-like sources. NIST refers to these as “puffs of smoke” but fails to properly analyze them. NIST also provides no explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers’ concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all directions.”

215 Comments

  1. Who owns the FBI?

    The FBI has it’s work done ‘for them’ and they still won’t do an investigation:

    Naming names:

    Skip to minute 22:00 and watch for a few minutes:

    (Watch the whole thing and see some of the rest of the scumbags)

    Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?

    https://youtu.be/mWLis-TVB2w

    The stink at the FBI is getting really bad.

    Go to minute 4:30 and listen for just a minute, then go to hour 1:15:00 and listen to THE whopper for 31/2 minutes:

    A Noble Lie Oklahoma City 1995

    https://youtu.be/vHDIhxeMOcI

    Obama Nominates OKC Bombing Criminal to Supreme Court

    https://youtu.be/tL9enczvnSI

    Hey FBI, any demolition expert would agree it would take MONTHS of engineering and installations to do this:

    This video is only 2 minutes (+) long:

    WTC7 — This is an Orange

    http://youtu.be/Zv7BImVvEyk

    Did anyone at the FBI see this?

    9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

    https://youtu.be/n3xgjxJwedA

    “Informed 9/11 Terror Trading” – Lars Schall

    http://bit.ly/1xfGu4x

  2. There is a very good NOVA program that debunks this conspiracy theory nonsense, and scientifically answers all the ‘questions’ in this article. This accusation isn’t true, and it gives a bad name to actual conspiracies such as electronically stealing elections.

    If the authors’ theories were real, then they have to answer questions like these:

    What reason did “The government” have to deliberately kill hundreds of people, especially centered around the financial hub of the country (where their powerful funders work,) and the pentagon, (the source of our military power?)
    Why would our military use a false flag operation to attack itself?

    Why would “the government” use commercial airliners full of innocent victims as a smoke screen when they could have blamed al qaeda bombers for the towers’ destruction without needing airplanes full of additional innocent victims?

    Why would a “false flag operation” have needed commercial airliners at all?

    How did “the government” recruit all those Saudi Arabian al qaeda extremists to do the actual hijacking, and flying the airplanes, and how could they have timed the explosions so perfectly?

    Why would “the government” add an attack on the Pentagon to a false flag operation, if they had the WTC towers rigged to blow?

    Where was the fourth hijacked plane headed, and who undid the explosion of whatever that target building was?

    How did the large group of conspirators necessary for such a huge operation manage to maintain 100% leak proof secrecy, hitherto unknown among groups of humans?  Why have there never been exposes of it on wikileaks?

    • Well stated! The effort to rig these buildings to implode would have taken weeks and someone somewhere would have noticed and 15 years later someone would have spilled the beans. Yes, there was I believe incompetence on the part of the bush administration in not following leads suggesting this event was to take place. The statement no one ever thought of this scenario is absolutely false as Hollywood made a movie about in the 90’s starring Steven Segal and Kurt Russell called Executive Decision, where a 747 loaded with nerve gas was going to crash into Washington.

      Your points are well made and the fact is never has an airliner the size of these planes full of aviation fuel crashed into a buildings before so there is no real way of knowing what the damage would have been.

      If you look at Michael Shermer’s books Why People Believe Weird Things and some of his articles, he explains the mindset behind conspiracy theories as do many other psychiatrists and psychologists.

    • I’m not a believer of conspiracy theories and really have no opinion one way or the other about this. But, I will say that most of your questions are pretty easily answered. Reason for it? To give Bush a reason to invade, he wanted the oil. And who better to keep all this crap secret BUT the Gov’t. As I said, I really would hope that our Gov’t wouldn’t be involved with such a thing, but it’s odd that the buildings fell the way they did, flat in on themselves. That was pretty lucky, it happened not once, but 3 times that day. 

    • A good reason to attack Iraq which was an illegal invasion and now using the same crap to invade Syria and also find and blame organisations. It is an industrial military complex. Instead of paying one trillion on weapons that kill people and corporations setting up companies in these Middle East and African nations how about looking after the American people more for a first world nation how come there are so many ghettos and poor all about power money and these people at the top do not care this is the problem people think Governments won’t do it to their own people well perhaps Jfk wouldn’t so they killed him and so from there the cia invented the term conspiracy theory to ridicule any investigations government have been involved in .

    • the “government” knew this was coming then prewired the buildings to ensure maximum destruction and simply allowed it to happen

    • The problem with your “debunking” is that none of those questions are about the physics of the event.  The physics are utterly separate from motivation, or who the perpetrators might be.  The research is simply stating that the building fell through demolition, which, assuming their physics and study is right in the details and calculations is simply fact—a fact that does not state anything about the whys and the hows of any possible orchestrators.

    • I agree totally. It may or may not be true but the day it happened I was at work and my employees and myself all agreed that the buildings looked like they imploded. This was when we were watching it live  as it happened.  Later that night around 2 am. I watched the flight over Pennsylvania get shot down. They even stated it my wife came home from work and watch it with me. Funny we never heard or saw anything about it again. In fact the Meade that flight out to be hero’s and made a movie about them. I know what I saw. 
        What a way to start the money making machine. Just like someone stated in a previous comment “why would the government kill citizens”. Why not? We are just cAttleboro and expendable. There was talk of people that funded the government in there. Really who? There where executive’s but no one of great financial power. Just the people that worked for them. What better way to get away with something. Do something so incredibly evil and depraved that no one would believe that our own government would do that. I could even see that as a talking point during the planning. Could you imagine being at that table…. no one would believe that we would do this this. Shit they will think that its just a conspiracy theory. Perfect plan. Then we will rebuild and create memorials. Hell it may even make America come together. Also the guy that just lease the towers gets a huge payday on the insurance he just took out on it 3p days ago. Win win.  
       Just saying it could most definately happen.

    • Where was the fourth hijacked plane headed, and who undid the explosion of whatever that target building was?  There was no fourth plane in that crater.  There was no fourth plane so no need to have to rig or unrig a building.  All the ‘fourth’ plane did was establish the myth of the heroic intervenor.

    • Look up the Project for the New American Century (they used to have a website at, IIRC, pnac.org). In particular, search for the phrase “a new Pearl Harbor”.

    • have you looked into this matter at all??
      stop thinking like a “normal” person. What would you be willing to do to have complete power?
      Kill someone? Thousands? How bout kill your own people just to convince them that they need to go to war?
      You ask about why the Pentagon……. wasn’t that where they were investigating the loss of TRILLIONS of American tax payers money??

      Open your eyes and stop being apart of the problem!!!

    • I dunno.  Why don’t you ask the government?  You live in a democracy, don’t you?    Actually …… no, you don’t, but you are too blind to see it, like most Americans.

    • With a conspiracy as big just think if more than one person know a secret it’s not a secret, this amount of people could not keep quite 

    • The Pentagon is not a tower.
      It is only 7 floors high.
      Kind of like a tower on it’s side.

      So you don’t have the upper floors collapsing the lower floors ( whether by accident or design ) as that would be across several miles vertically not horizontally

  3. Poor olive Bulb!  Still clinging to the ‘turists did it’ bushism.
    If you haven’t looked into this false flag operation yet then go back to sleep. 

  4. Hahahahaha you fucking morons.  Where is your peer reviewed results? Oh,thats right,this was not a real study, was not funded, and holds no bearing! Silly conspiracy theorists!  One day we will have hospitals for people with your mental illness!

    • I suggest you download the linked PDF and actually read it.
      The Government spent more on the Clinton investigation than the 911 inquiry …. let that just sink in……

    • You don’t have to be a scientist to understand that WTC buildings were blown. And then we have many vitnesses who saw bombs in the buildings. 

    • I guess you really don’t know too many people who investigate conspiracies then. I’m 45 and do not live in a trailer. 

    • You might need to stop drinking your fluoride water and do some much needed research.  Oh no, you already know because you saw it on the news.  (That must be true lol). 

    • Nothing is more a joke than the official conspiracy theory about “Osama & His 19 Li’l Hijackers’.

      Then try ‘September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor’ and come back to explain, point by point, what you disagree with.

  5. No fire ever brought a steel structure down? Well how many times have they tried to do it with thousands of pounds of her fuel sorry but I saw what it did and sorry to say these scientists are idiots

    • Yes. To save millions on costly removal of asbestos in insulation in the buildings brought down… to give credence to a need to invade the Middle East so the US economy (military economy – every “Tomahawk” cost $500.000) can be supported…to deflect focus from the general public as to the horrible demise of their existence…and to give every one on the planet a 1984 villain to “hate” to deflect them from original thought. I can’t say it better. 

    • Roosevelt did not have Congress approval to enter in the European war. War is money. He was just exiting the “Great Depression” and he needed a new “goal”. It is no secret the Americans had already cracked the Japanese radio codes, they knew they were coming. It is obvious to every primary school child, that it was planned that the American Aircraft carriers would be on “exercise” duties when Pearl Harbour was hit on December 7, to allow 3000 sailors to die and to be able to enter the (money-making) war. Oddly, roughly the same amount of people that died in 09/11….never thought that til now. Odd coincidence.

    • We all are aware of that information, but for some reason you do not address this specific issue within the article? What is up with that?

    • The authors of the report are scientists and are thus only concerned with and qualified to comment on the science of what happened to the buildings, NOT the politics of “whodunit”. IMO, that is one of the main problems with the aftermath of that day: the people only listened to the Faux News(?) “man-in-the-street” actor plant (“Harley guy”, Marc Walsh), and the p.o.s. politicians and military “experts” with an agenda for a corporate fascist neo-colonial war of military adventure (as well as “W” the Insane Killer Klown King’s obsessive/compulsive desire to show his daddy that he can finish what daddy started and get revenge on Saddam for the audacity of trying to blow up daddy) and a pre-prepared story line, not the criminal investigators and experts in the design, construction, and demolition of high-rise structural steel buildings. So, first things first: 1) an objective scientific investigation into WTF actually happened to the buildings; 2) then “whodunit”; 3) and finally, what are we going to do about it? …and we’ve never really gotten past getting step #1right, just jumping to pre-arranged conclusions to sally forth off to war like a bunch of viciously dangerous idiots. Pathetic. 😉

    • the US declared war on Germany after they declared war on the US; Germany declared war on the US after the US declared war on Japan. We broke the codes after the attack on Pearl Harbor; that’s why we were waiting when Japan attacked Midway.

    • HUGE FAIL … for the Towers were NOT riddled in asbestos, for the use of asbestos was outlawed DURING construction and so was ONLY used in one Tower and ONLY up to the 38th floor.

      So removal would NOT cost millions whatsoever making this idiotic claim the nonsense it is.

    • Correct Red Anchor. But the financial incentives of war are secondary to the overarching goal of a global government empire under the leadership of one, whether that be one institution or one individual or a combination of both such as the Vatican’s Jesuits and its Jesuit Pope.
      — But Albert Pike’s outline for 3 world wars (http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm) has been right on the money for stage 1 and 2 and it seems obvious that stage 3 is the ‘war on terror’ with the enemy being a provocateuring agent of chaos and calamity as a scapegoat or patsy. (see Aaron Russo/Nick Rockefellar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Wsb4qBckU)
      — But behind a patsy always exists the real culprit and that is the shadow governments/secret societies who are truly responsible for the ‘9/11’ false flag psyop and other state-sponsored terrorist events such as the Boston Marathon bombing, Alfred.P Murrah Bldg., ship sinkings, airplane crashes, and possibly even major natural disasters with today’s black-budget military and scientific technologies.
      — The goal is to twist the arm of the world behind its back forcing us to cry ‘UNCLE,’ ultimately trading in our individual liberty for the “tranquil existence” of slavery, just as Patrick Henry exclaimed.
      — “Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God! I know not what course others may take but as for me, GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!”
      http://uncontrolledopposition.com or http://elijah1757.wordpress.com

    • The WTC Towers were built from 1968 to 1972. A slurry mixture of asbestos and cement was sprayed on as fireproofing material. But this practice was banned by the New York City Council in 1971. This halted the spraying, but not before hundreds of tons of the material had been applied. only  the last year of construction was Asbestos use banned. Asbestos Abatement (not removal) projects on nearby buildings can be used to set an estimate of 70 million plus per building for an Abatement project taking 5 years each if the buildings were abandoned, and 10 plus years each and  more money if they were occupied.

  6. This isn’t an actual study, just some anecdotal summations, most of it easy to shoot down. Ask yourself a simple question; if this was as these three blokes are suggesting,now could the logistics of such an operation be kept secret? The scale of this would have been immune. Demolition experts to place the explosives, the provision of the explosives, securing suitably insane people to fly into buildings full of people and so on. Keeping that a secret? Nah.

  7. This nonsense will never die it will just get bigger like most absurd conspiracy theories do. Read real science journals instead of this stuff. 

    • Read all the evidence, watch all the videos…do you see a plane hitting the pentagon? What about that wingspan that would easily have taken out every light pole on it’s trajectory into the building?

      No bodies in Pennsylvania, no plane, just scattered debris.
      Explosions going off in the BASEMENT of the buildings just prior to the planes hitting, according to eye witnesses who were in the building during the moments before and after the bombing, news casters ~PRE-EMPTING~ the collapse of building seven, saying it had already collapsed WHILE IT WAS STANDING IN LIVE SHOTS IN THE BACKGROUND, Eye-witness and video accounts of the planes ~NOT~ being passenger airliners, but un-makred military aircraft with no windows…Eye-witness reports of one of the flights being forced to land at an airport with military personnel ushering the passengers into a hangar before the plane took off again with no passengers on board, NORAD standing down in the midst of a terror attack, when the only person capable of telling them to stand down is the President…Why would the president tell the military to stand down during the worst attack on our soil EVER?
      How about video evidence of explosions going off BELOW the point of contact where the buildings were collapsing, all of these little explosions taking place 10-15 stories down from where the building was collapsing, Or the eye-witness accounts of construction crews loading thermite charges on the support pillars?  How do you explain away PERFECT 45 degree angled cuts in steal support beams?

      When you can explain that all away LOGICALLY, get back to me on your nonsensical view of the world…

    • Dude, did you read it? Fire has NEVER brought down a skyscraper in this fashion EVER. And now you’re saying that it happened THREE times the same day? That, my frind, is a really absurd theory.

    • I can agree to some extent, as it’s obvious that the planes didn’t cause the falls. I understood the same day in 2001 that the official theory was false. The only plausible explanation for the falls are nuclear underground explosions. The very significant signatures on the seismic recordings of the explosions before the falls also confirm this.

    • Fire and an airplane impact that was exponentially larger and faster than the plane that hit the empire state building both happened.  Why do they put spray on fireproofing on structural steel if it does nothing?  Now ask yourself if a 767 going full speed could knock some paper mache off of some steel.  It’s not like the planes didn’t take out all kinds of structural steel when they hit the building.  Your head contains a vacuum and you try to project that vacuum and think that every element that occurred on that day happened in a vacuum.  

    • How many fires have consumed multiple floors of a skyscraper at the same moment?  And how many of them were hit by large airplanes?  What?!!??  None??  Crazy!!?!?!

    • How about the behavior of George Bush after his presidency.  He is mostly absent.  HE paints all day.  He seems he has lost it.  Something very odd about his behavior post presidency.  

  8. “Why would the government murder its own citizens?”  Waco, Ruby Ridge, Oklahoma City Murrah Building.
    In fact, in the WTC case, a Jewish messaging service called Odigo DID broadcast a warning to subscribers to stay away from work that day.
    As to the Oklahoma city Murrah Building case, FBI and ATF agents were told not to report to work that day.
    In addition, critical records regarding illegal government operations were present at both sites…and needed to be destroyed…

    • Not saying our government was responsible, but it got us into the Iraq war where there was money to be made, I hear the bill was in the trillions.

    • Go to YouTube and search “The Dancing Israelis”. A New Jersey woman saw what was later found to be Mosad agents filming the first plane crash and celebrating. Then Jersey police pulled them over on the George Washington Bridge and found explosives in their vehicle. They arrested them, shortly after Feds showed up and took them. A week later they’re on a talk show in Israel saying “It was our job to film the event.” This implies prior knowledge… no other possibility. Yes Israel was obviously a part of it. It should take all of a nanosecond to realize what they have to gain from this. If you can’t understand ask and I’ll continue.

  9. General Tommy Frank stated  3 days prior to 9/11 when asked what his great fear was….replied that terrorists would  make another attempt to bring down  the World Trade Center Towers …

  10. ….
    Every thinking person KNOWS the World Trade Center never existed. It was created as a movie background.
    September 11 was a reality show created to get the American people to vote, because as a democracy everything happens by popular vote, to go to war so George W Bush and Dick Cheney could make Halliburton richer.

  11. Well, The videos of those planes hitting each tower…were controlled…by the terrorism that is islam. (small case intentional and I also notice that this site’s ‘spell check’ accepts ‘Christian’ in all lower case.)

  12. Thermite plasma…all structural steel beams were cut at 45 degree inclination causing “shearing”.  A process conducted for decades in destruction of buildings. The fact that the planes hit the building obliquely and therefore would have caused greater heat to melt the structure from the side of impact, would suggest a “toppling” effect and not the “straight down” implosion both buildings had…not to mention that building 7  (if I am not wrong) never even had a an impact from a plane, so why should it have collapsed as well??? Hmm Perhaps we should ask Bush or Bin Laden.

    • Building 7 shares the basement and foundations of the other buildings.  If the basement parking garage collapses, building 7 will fall too, first a drop in the basement 5-6 floors down, and then by the sudden stop crack into itself.  -Exactly what happened…  The 2 big towers however, dunno…  the pane got to the centre and exploded there, so the most heat was in fact in the centre of the structure

    • No… and no… Based on that flawed theory, building 7 would have toppled over. it would not have been a free fall collapse. Try again.

  13. Three buildings wired for demolition colluding and no one knows about it.  No one from this team of demolitionists feels guilty and comes forward.  No death bed admissions.   Its a stretch to me it could be kept quiet.   Were they conspiritors with the terrorists?   How did they know to have it wired up and ready to explode on 9/11?  What kind of explosives did they use and how did they keep them hidden?

    • Not terrorists from overseas. Internal agents. CIA…the government. Do you think it normal, that that many planes could be commandeered at just the right time? Damned good planning, I’d say.

    • Osama bin Ladin as a child saw US war planes take out 2 towers in Lebanon and carefully planned his revenge on the Great Satan

    • The article does not even talk about that.  All the article discusses is the question of whether or not the buildings fell due to demolition or plane crashes. There is no attempt by the article to address your questions.  Those are separate questions that need a different inquiry.

    • I know all about it.  People are stupid and fortunately, most believe as you do, otherwise the world would have hung the people denying it was planned and carried out as a mission.  Listen, if you don’t want to “believe” some thing that is so obvious, that’s YOUR choice, but you are a fool and no one gives a rats ass what YOU think.  You need to go home and bury your head in your cozy ass and stfu.  I am not surprised there are so many people like you that are being paid by corps entities or are somehow benefitting from the lies perpetuating that terrorists somehow pulled off this demolition.  It’s too obvious fucktard.

  14. Hidden? Weeks of “maintenance” Thermite plasma is nothing more than a string of sausages that heats above the melting point of steel, making it liquid. No bang, just heat. The steel becomes butter and just slides. There were no terrorists apart from the US government. Terrorizing you into submission. To accept military action that brings in dollars. Bush and Bin Laden had lunch the day before 09/11 http://www.globalresearch.ca/george-w-bush-and-the-bin-laden-family-meet-in-new-york-city-one-day-before-911/5332870

  15. You do realize that this site publishes fake, semi-fake, and misleading “news” as real news, right? 

    The statement, “A European scientific study has concluded…” is followed by an explanation that the study was actually conducted by three Americans and a Canadian, along with an American man who is the director of strategy and development for “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth,” a non-profit that supports 9/11 conspiracy theories. No bias at all there!

    The study was then published in Europhysics Magazine, along with the disclaimer, “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.” Even the magazine knew the content wasn’t purely scientific, only “interesting.”

    The study was not done by a European scientific group (as the headline claimed), but by one mostly  made up of Americans, and one man in particular who is dedicated to furthering 9/11 conspiracy theories. That makes it absolutely questionable in every respect.

    • Have you seen any of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth material?  If you had, you would realize that the conspiracy lies with the government cover up. The govt version of events is absurd, infantile and impossible. Wake-up!

    • Waste of time, brain cells destroyed by multiple years of propaganda telling citizens how wonderful they are. Either that or some were complicit and trying to avoid the inevitable backlash. The purveyors of the government explanation, did an amazingly shitty job with their story, and the contrived videos of planes striking the buildings, should be proof enough, but well, you see.

    • I saw the list of engineers who signed on at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth and it is less than a tenth of one percent of engineers and most of them were civil engineers who design sewers and traffic engineers and such.

    • Gages Gaggle are a JOKE … it is not a credible site, but a now NINE YEAR OLD PETITION page that is nothing more than a giant appeal to authority to keep Gages wages rolling in.

      And it has LESS than one tenth of one percent actual professional support … just how gullible and dumb do you need be to think some OLD petition that in NINE YEARS has only garnished LESS THEN 1% signatures even counts.

    • Given that Europhysics News really is the magazine of the scientific community of physicists in Europe (readily verified), do you think they would publish that paper if they thought it was some kooky conspiracy theory? Legitimate scientific publications are careful and conservative in what and how the publish. This paper is a feature article published to coincide with the 15th anniversary of 9/11.

      And they don’t just describe it as “interesting” they say it is “sufficiently technical” to warrant publication. (translation: the arguments are science-based.) 
      Given the volatile political nature of the material, they are simply being careful and yet showing great courage in publishing this. 

    • Also this study skirts the fact that the towers were hit by planes FULL OF FUEL which ignited and produced a very intense heat that quickly melted the steel braces to the point where they were soft and unable to support the structure.

    • The corporate mainstream media publishes lots of “fake, semi-fake, and misleading “news” as real news”. If you believe what the US Government and the corporate mainstream media tell you, you are simply a chump who wants to believe in lies.

    • Oh yeah. The planes FULL OF FUEL explains how building 7 fell as well. That was some serious heat. It melted those beams from a block away. Thanks for that info.  SMH

    • “it is less than a tenth of one percent of engineers”

      Sorry, but the numbers of those who refute the official story is no scientific argument.

      But since you’re at it, let’s see how many engineers and architetcs you can find that they will sign that they believe the official  NIST cover-up.

  16. We know this information came out years ago.  Bush knew the Saudi’s were going to blow up that WTC.

  17. And the plains that crashed into them?  The truth is, yes, the buildings were designed to withstand a plain crash, but only to a particular point.  Every building has a week spot, where it can be taken out by the shear force of damage, and the supports cannot hold it up.  It’s a law of physics, it cannot be compensated for past a particular size building.  The planes were aimed right at those points.  I remember that day very well, and to say that it was a hoax is criminally ignorant.  Now, if you want to say Bush jr exploited those deaths to begin decades of war, I’ll agree with that 100%. 

    • You only have to look at the official videos (in slow motion) of the second plane hitting the tower to realize that it was all CGI.  No REAL plane could fly through the building like it was slicing through butter (at any speed).  Let alone how the film clearly shows the wing disappear behind a building on the way to the tower, where that was physically impossible.  Plane – aluminum.  Building – steel and concrete. 

  18. Don’t forget the video that showed a wing moving behind a building that actually was behind the Twin Towers. Look it up.

    Total ORGANIZED CRIME, complete with patsies (the miracle passports).

  19. The intense NSA/CIA/Pentagon spy efforts made the organized criminals aware of possible patsies, who would provide the “New Pearl Harbor” as documented in the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), so they let it happen as it suited them well.

  20. What do you expect from an article right next to another article that says, “toenail fungus destroyed my life?!”

  21. The first thing that threw me off about this was the Pentagon strike…a Passenger airliner’s wingspan alone would have destroyed power lines and light poles on it’s way into the building (According to the “official” report’s 3D examination of the crash and strike trajectory, which conveniently left out all light poles and electrical lines)…there wasn’t a single damaged light pole anywhere on the property except immediately where the plane supposedly struck. They only found ONE engine..too small to be an airliner engine, but about the right size for a missile engine. Eye-witness reports state that a military aircraft was seen flying low over buildings just moments prior to the explosion.
    After diving deeper into it, I realized that I’d watched lies being told, live, on the air, about building 7’s collapse. This collapse was pre-empted by news outlets up to an HOUR before it even happened!
    And why did building 7 collapse so readily? Contrary to popular belief, thermite charges are not built into a tall structure for the simple fact that they could be used to bring the building down prematurely. So they had to have set those charges PRIOR to the attack for them to have been ready to set off for the controlled demolition (This one was deliberately told to us that it would be collapsed for “Safety”, when we know the real reason was the insurance policy and they were hiding documents in that building. They said it was because the building was on fire and structurally damaged, but the building was NOT on fire, NOT structurally damaged, and still had ALL of their equipment inside.
    10 second controlled free-fall…explosions going off on floors ~below~ the epicenter of the destruction, eye-witness reports that neither of the planes were passenger airliners, but un-marked military aircraft with no windows (Video evidence suggests the same, when examined closely), and eye-witness reports of there being explosions in the ~BASEMENT~ prior to the planes hitting the buildings.
    Apparently, the same ID was found in 2 different places, when not even the dial-pad on a telephone survived the disaster…rather convenient that they found an ID amidst the rubble when it SHOULD have melted into plastic slag on impact due to the intensity of the fires, I mean…it was supposedly hot enough to melt steel, so plastic should have been charred black and turned to ash long before the building even collapsed.
    Perfect 45 degree angle cuts in the building’s primary support structures found in the rubble after the collapse…Only thermite can cut that clean, that fast, and eye-witness reports state that there were construction crews in the building setting something unknown up on the primary support columns in the building about a week before the collapse..
    NORAD stood down amidst an attack on American soil…ONLY the president can tell NORAD to stand down. Why would he do that when we’re being “attacked”?
    People who see this mountain of evidence and still deny it, need to pull their heads out of the sand before it’s too late.
    Your leaders don’t care about you. They’ll use you, and your emotions, to get their way. To get your consent to go to war, they orchestrated the worst attack on American Soil since Pearl Harbor. To get you riled up, they told you it was saddam and some brown people in the Middle East.
    False flag operations have been a thing since antiquity…Hitler used one to jumpstart WWII…and we’re in the process of jumpstarting WWIII, because too many people are willingly letting the blinders be placed upon their heads.
    Your rights, my rights, are being stripped away one by one in the name of “national Security”…
    Welcome to 1984..

    • I agree with a lot of what you write except for the ‘no passenger plane’ bit.  A friend of mine was on the American Airlines plane that supposedly hit the WTC.  She was on the passenger manifest & she certainly disappeared.  So if she didn’t die in a plane crash, where is she?

    • Is it possible they just killed her and disposed of her? They killed over 3000 people why would a few more be difficult to comprehend? 

    • She died in a plane crash but the  plane she was on did not hit WTC. it went into the  ocean  so there was no trace of it.

    • 3000??? l’d say they murdered millions of innocent people already, including 500,000 infants in their own homes, minding their own business. Everyone seems to conveniently forget lrak, Afghanistan and the rest of the middle east they’re destroying since 911.

    • If you are truly interested in the whereabouts of your friend I can give you a few leads. You can check FAA records to verify any of this Each of the planes involved in 911 loaded at one gate and took off from another gate. The Number of people on these flights were minimal for the flights, in fact the passengers and crew from all the aircraft would very nicely fit into 1 767 with room too spare. All that being  said, EVERY plane in American Airspace was grounded that day, with the exception of 1 plane that left NYC in the middle of all this headed east over the Atlantic. My bet would be your friend was on that one single plane in American airspace that was not grounded.

    • Where indeed. Is it so far from the realm of possibilities to suggest that if the government was willing to perpetrate mass murder on that scale, that the alibi occupants of that airliner weren’t simply ‘dealt with’ separately ahead of time? 

    • The government don’t care about people.  In fact, they were a sacrifice.  Imagine if they demolished the buildings after emptying them out.  What impact would that have had?  Nothing.  The whole official story is so full of holes that the government responsible must have been laughing at how gullible the public was.

  22. One has but to look at what was announced on September 10th of 2001 to wonder about the validity of the 9/11 “attacks.” 

    Google it.

    • Exactly, I actually saw that report the day before the demolition.  Then everything went quiet about that.  I also saw Larry Silverstein say that building 7 was pulled (controlled demolition term).  You can’t just ‘pull’ a building in less than 1 day.  It takes a lot of preparation to set the explosives, etc.  and would take more than 1 day. 

  23. This is not a European Study, it is not a scientific study, its not even a study, is an opinion piece on an old debunked study in a pay to publish vanity journal

  24. On scene witness said it was blowing up from below them when they were trying to exit. Heard it once and then never could read or find it again.

    • Care to elucidate a bit more on your pontification from on high …or are you just going to leave  your comment as a vague one liner troll turd? You do realize that one of the four physicists that created this report is a member of A&E for 9/11 truth and that that organization, along with its numerous Architects and Engineers, most of whom specialize in high-rise structures, has many REAL top shelf demolition experts, as well as explosives experts and chemical engineers among its members that were most likely consulted for input into this report, right? They also have a number of Doctors of Psychiatry and Psychology too …maybe you need to get their take on your cognitive dissonance?

  25. I am an Architectural and Civil Engineering Tech (Dean’s List student in college and exceptional performance in the field, i.e. not just a C- student and pro hack) and knew immediately as I watched that day that it was a controlled demo. Only, IMO, what threw most people off is that, in order to support the desired scenario of planes striking the top of the structures, the demo had to be inverted from the norm of a bottom up demo (to limit flying debris and dust) to that of a top down (thus causing the volcanic-like pyroclastic flow of disintegrated concrete and the upward  and outward ejection of massive structural steel members and human body parts that would be physically impossible with a “pancaking” floor failure, as claimed by the bogus “official” explanation) demo. But, IMHO, the 1st pilot (onboard, or remote- remember, the military was perfecting the flight systems for its drones then…) fucked up and hit the wrong building (though dead on target square into the centre of the structure), causing the second plane to have to make an unexpected last second adjustment to barely clip the corner of the South Tower, which would be why the last to be hit, with the least amount of impact damage and the vast majority of its fuel burning outside the building (it also didn’t have the added weight of the huge antenna on the North Tower), was the first to drop….OOOOPPPSSSSIE!!!  It would have been interesting to have seen what would have happened if that second plane hit the same as the 1st, or missed the second entirely …and then the untouched Tower “fell” on schedule without being hit at all, haha! …DOH!  😉

    • “…it also didn’t have the added weight of the huge antenna on the North Tower),…” The north tower was struck at a much higher point, thus had far less overall weight bearing down from the building above, tower notwithstanding. There was much more building above the South Tower.

  26. This forgets both planes hijacked were cross country flights with the planes loaded with jet fuel. The terrorists new the core of the buildings would not hold up to gallons of burning jet fuel pouring down
    the elevator shafts.

  27. What a great steaming pile of dreck.

    This is NOT a “scientific study” … but an ARTICLE in a MAGAZINE … NOT a journal of the recycled crap Jones&Co. spouted years ago.

    This is NOT new or an achievement … man, are you lot gullible.

  28. OKAY.  I BUY THAT IF  ……   You can explain how they managed to get the army of explosives experts to set all the charges without alarming the janitors, security personnel, or casual observers who must have been present at least some of the time?  And what about the security footage?   Did it all disappear in the pile of junk the buildings turned into?  And why did they set it to start blowing up 45 minutes to an hour after the crashes and fires?  And why do the wheel wells that are supposed to be bomb bays look exactly like the wheel wells on all the same model planes still in use.  I got a couple more that are a little more difficult to answer after you get these answered.  Don’t want anyone to become overwhelmed here.

  29. There are some information and theories overlooked in this study.
    ONE; High heat of Thermite temperature can be self generated when all the elements to create it are present. A few years later, in Arizona, the main giders of a freeway bridge were warped to the point where they could no longer withstand vehicle traffic. This was caused by the collision of two semi trucks, causing one to catch fire. The semi and it’s cargo contained all the elements to create Thermite. Once ignited it did just that, thus increasing the temperature beneath the bridge to the weakenening point upon the structure above the accident location. The same scenario is found in the WTC buildings. [Note: For obvious reasons, I did not mention the components needed for Thermite.] 
    TWO; The chief architecht of the towers stated they were designed to collapse straight down on their own footprint in the event of an failure of the structure. The towers were not made with the box style supports found in almost every building. Rather they were the cantilevier design with a main center core. Oh yes a cantiliever design will hold the weight if it has a slight support at the outer tip of the girder. Look af a wall shelf with that style support. It will hold 10 times the stand alone weight with a simple thin support at the tip. The outer walls of the towers created that thin support feature.
    THREE; The commentarty about the towers being designed to withstand a airplane crash was made based on a plane in level flight and would affect only one floor. Both aircraft made a 40 degree bank immediately before impact, thus doing significant damage to three or four floors.
    FOUR; there were no explosions from the ground up. The explosion series seen were from the top down; and they coincided with the locations of the Diesel Generators every ten floors that provided emergency standby power.
    FIVE; The buildings were built in three floor segments and attached to a center core. The planes crashed so they would strageically weaken the structure at ten to fifteen floors from the top. Thus the weight of that would cause the floors below to fall. This is evidenced by the news video showing the top floors above the crash level remained intact until almost to the bottom. The kinetic energy of these increased the downward pressure accelerating their impact upon the lower floors. Since the main core was also segmented the leverage on it would eventually sever sections as well.
    SIX; The video evidence that Tower 7 was damaged critically by debris from one of the big towers that took out a big slice of its west side. In order to protect the safety of rescue workers in the main disaster area this building had to be brought down. If you look at the tower seven demolition it was the conventional bottom up scenario. This was accomplishe by experts whose business is to destroy things in hostile and dangerous environments. The supplies to accomplish this were readilly available from an Army Depot located an hour and fifteen minuites (driving time at normal freeway speed with no police escort – which they would have had – from the George Washington Bridge). That bridge, and, the city highway to ground zero were closed to unauthorized traffic during the first few days.
    SEVEN; Osama bin Laden was a Civil Engineer with knowledge of how to instruct the pilots on what to do to accomplish the destruction this time. Since the previous attemptt by truck bomb in the garage didn’t work.

    The first alarm of a plane crash was from a EMS unit who saw the first crash from the Manhattan side of the Williamsburg Bridge.

    The shutdown of the NY Stock Exchange was due to the partial collapse of Tower 7. The main distribution point for AT&T communications, located in the sub-basement of that building was demolished in that collapse, Thus shutting down the NYSE communications with the rest of the world. It also disabled most of the telephone service in the area.

    My information on the incident is from a presentation by the Manhattan Burough Chief of the New York Fire Department who was recalled to duty when his successor was killed in the collapse of the Emergency Operations Center. He was the one that directed the demolition of tower 7. In this presentation we saw video footage from the NYFD and NYPD aircraft. They recorded almost everything that happened.

    • Best reply against a conspiracy so far. But why was this info in your last paragraph not made public? I have never seen that before. However, this doesn’t account for the missle hitting the Pentagon and the FBI immediately removing all camera footage in the area. Witnesses did not see a plane, but a missle, according to reports on the net.

  30. WTC7 lookes like a controlled demolition.  1 & 2 were definitely brought down by the planes and fire.  Buildings are designed tobe five times as strong as necessary, but WTC 1 & 2 had two sides removed by the plane.  It’s not that every other support was removed, it was that most of the supports on two sides were removed.  The beams on the  outside of WTC 1 & 2 were part of the supporting structure.  The Sparks were caused by the trillions of joules released by the energy of the collapse.  I can only agree on WTC7.  

  31. So…were these explosives placed when the buildings were constructed.  If not, I find it possible but not likely.  Then again I do not put it out of the realm of possibility.

    • There were security workers who stated that weeks prior to the attack, the regular security systems were turned off in order for “certain adjustments to be made” and that during that time there were strangers entering and bringing in stuff. What is interesting to me is that the collapse of the third building is not even mentioned in the formal government report and that none of the ground workers were ever interviewed…and they are the ones who reported the underground explosions. 

  32. If that were true, WHERE ARE THE PLANES THAT TOOK OFF THAT DAY AND THE PEOPLE ON THEM?  DID YOU NOT SEE THE PLANES FLY INTO THE BUILDINGS? 

  33. Not very many high rise fires have been started by massive quantities of high octane jet fuel.  Why is this not mentioned ?

  34. People that believe this stupid shit should not be allowed to pro create. Spend time and money on something worthwhile as opposed to conspiracy crap. SMFH. 

  35. Only the most easily led idiots believe the towers and Bldg 7 fell due to fire.  Our government was responsible for 911.   

  36. You people are all insane. And any engineer who doubts why this fell is an idiot who should have their license revoked.

  37. Total bull shit. Just me obama bashing Bush. Y’all believe these idiots. 2 jets fill of fuel brought down those buildings. 

  38. Brian Scott Preston I don’t believe it…. sorry.. They keep telling me that a missile hit the pentagon when I saw the crash site within 20 minutes of the crash (shooting for NTV Moscow) and personally know three eyewitnesses who saw the plane hit the building– one of them is my brother-in-law. PBS did a well researched documentary on this explaining how the structure of the World Trade Center made it vulnerable to this type of collapse. There are only a few companies in the world that know how to bring down a building with controlled demolition. It would take a crew doing an incredible amount of noisy work in a building that was occupied around the clock. Then there is the conspiracy factor. One of these workers would have blown the whistle by now. Snowdon? ..AND if the government is so willing to go to such great lengths to fake this then where are the “weapons of mass destruction”? It is way easier to fake the weapons of mass destruction than to blow up two massive iconic buildings in front of the world. All they had to do was have one guy plant a few suitcases full of plutonium in the Iraqi desert and arrange for a few unwitting grunts to find it. Case solved

  39. Let’s not forget the episode of The Lone Gunmen with the same plot about the airlines which was written with the assistance of the CIA, that aired shortly before the WTC towers were attacked in real life. 

  40. there’s a person in here that starts his name with Cyan, and has many other last names plus other names is the same person that keeps trying to tell you that this is all bullshit … he doesn’t want you to think or look into any of this shit … he knows more then you might think !

  41. Just an in depth way of scientifically trying to explain the inexplicable. Okay granted, the buildings weren’t designed to collapse during fires of extreme temperatures. They should have been much more sturdier than to buckle as they did. And because the structures failed on September 11, 2001, it must’ve been due to governmental insiders conducting a “controlled demolition” of the buildings causing the deaths of thousands in the process. Just when I thought I had heard it all, you spring this one on me. Truthfully, I’ve read over the years since 9/11 this hypothesis being floated as to explain that catastrophic day. But come on now, the sensible mind knows that the scenario depicted, strains credulity to the hilt.

  42. That is the dumbest bunch of smart people ever. The report done by engineers, not physicist concluded a different finding. First the fire protection was cut off above a certain point and zero water was allowed to keep the structure protected. Second the planes were fully fueled for cross country and were fully laden with thousands of gallons of fuel, this super heated the structure. Third, the towers were of unique design that the exterior also was encompassed with the structure and when the planes cut this, this started the domino effect of failure. Red the full report which is available online, when you read the entire thing is makes perfect sense….not this crap written by Physicist. 

  43. You guys are nuts. Apparently you cannot comprehend the real evil that hates America, so you have to associate it with an evil you already believe exists.

    Seriously, no one in our government is competent enough to pull off such a scheme, plus if they really invented the conspiracy, why didn’t they just include terrorists adding the demolition charges too?
    You fail the common sense test.

  44. So much of this shit is reworded from speeches about Area 51 and Aliens, oh yes all that shit about the Lunar Landings done on a sound stage in Arizona……and the list goes on… The one I like the most is Obama is the best president America has ever had and Hilary wouldn’t lie……crock o shit….

  45. Ok , did You jackasses take into consideration the Fact that Airplane fuel burnes hotter than a regular fire. There were Many witnesses to the Planes flying into the WWT’S . I guess You should put this in Your Hypothesis, My Family helped build those buildings. You are obviously desperate to get Your names out in the public. Now You have. And I will share this story. Hope You like retirement, because People from almost every state in the USA knew Someone who was lost that day in NYC, WASHINGTON AND A LONELY FIELD IN PENNSYLVANIA. I guess The next Terrorist attack in Europe or Any Of Your Home Countries or States. We will consider it an act of Natural Selection of Nature. May God have mercy on Your souls !!!

    • No one buys your paid trolling anymore. Judging by your sentence structure, grammar and spelling, you appear to be North American. I’ve noticed over the years that a lot of the paid government trolling has been outsourced to places like India. I’m impressed that you were able to find such a small article to spread disinformation on. I would’ve thought that 9/11 disinformation dissemination would’ve been low priority for your bosses at this point.

    • Did any of them get cancer from all the Aesbestos that was in the building that the EPA knew all about and was going to require Billions of dollars in renovation to get up to code? A whole bunch of clean up workers did because their government officials lied to them about not needing masks.

    • Airplane fuel does indeed burn hotter than an ordinary fire.
      That is because it burns extremely fast.
      After a few minutes, all that would be left burning would be office furniture. The aviation fuel would have all gone up in flames.

      Indeed the footage of the plane hitting the tower shows it ploughing into the steel outer shell of the tower without slowing down, which even you know, is impossible.
      That people died was indeed a tragedy but they did not die because of the planes flying into the towers.

    • Just shut up and get lost you moron, just another kosher shill making dumb claims such as your family building them and inferring that this somehow makes you an expert, so was it your entire family involved including grandparents and distant cousins or what, as to the LONELY FIELD IN PENNSYLVANIA where are the bodies, where’s the plane, there wasn’t one and we all know that even if you don’t so get lost.

    • Kathy, are you aware of the temperatures inside a jet engine ?????? If not, kindly google the subject and gain some knowledge on the matter. Internal jet engine parts are manufactured from ???????? Yes, metal, would you believe that ?? And that metal does not MELT, loose shape, or fall apart, nor does it burn as many folks seem to believe.
      So if the FACTS, state that jet A 1 fuel cannot melt steel, how then could the buildings steel supports be melted ????? IF, as you claim, your family helped build those buildings, then they would know they should have withstood the collision with the planes. After all the designers made that claim, and still do today.
      YEP, many people lost relatives that day, that’s why they are unable to accept, that their own Government is complicit in their murder, despite the FACT, many previous U.S. administrations have done exactly the same thing .
      This behavior will not stop, until folks like you wise up to the reality.
      B.T.W. I’m not the slightest interested in getting my name anywhere, you are projecting your own mind set here, onto others.

  46. CIA agent, Malcom Howard said that feds decided to pull building seven down. ‘pull’ is a demolition term to blow up the building to bring it down. said in 2014 ( #OperationNewCentury
    Larry A. #Silverstein b. May 30, 1931, born at Brooklyn made over $5 million for World Trade Tower Collapses while Deep State Investors made Billions in Wall Street trades in advance too ) when the CIA destroyed the buildings. John Kerry said yes! , true. Too. And then CIA agent, on a deathbed; he says he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center.

    audios have explosions and admitted Eye —witnesses on scene over heard talking about CarVans loaded with explosives on the ground floors . One notices that pulverization only happens upon demolition classic collapses as a building falls, directly down upon itself, which statistically for three buildings to fall directly downward was logically impossible. Malcom Howard wanted to make that point because he claims the C.I.A. was very surprised there was not an uproar, as we see on television, shows after shows of demolition experts showing off and these buildings fell classical ‘pull-down’ style and explosives can be seen preceeding two floors down from the main threshold – collapse, on each of the high Trade Towers. Building 7 was detonated, according to John Kerry by a conscious decision. Explain that stuff U.S. Congress ?

    • No need to go that far; there’s a video of Silverstein himself admitting to having given the order to “pull” the building down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.