An embarrassing new report has highlighted the poor security of Britain’s nuclear weapons. The study, commissioned by the European Leadership Network (ELN), highlights the fact that UK nukes could be hacked by cyber terrorists, allowing them to launch a missile from a submarine.
The study worryingly concludes that Britain’s nuclear weapons can never be fully protected against a cyber attack.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
WEF Anoint Charles ‘The Great Reset King’
WEF To Force Public To Wear ‘Brain Implants’ So the Elite Can Read Their Minds
Woody Harrelson Slams Big Pharma: 'The Last People You Should Trust With Your Health'
NASA Insider Confesses on Deathbed: I Filmed Fake Moon Landing in 1969
Disney’s ‘Little Demon’ Is Normalizing Satanism and Pedophilia for the Masses
Nostradamus Predicted 'Great Uprising' Against King Charles III
King Charles III Vows To Usher In ‘Great Reset’ Following Queen Elizabeth’s Death
Bill Gates’ Factory Breeding 30 Million Mosquitos Infected With ‘Infertility Bacteria’ Per Week
WEF Orders Journalists To ‘Cease and Desist’ Exposing Secret Globalist Agenda
According to the report, there is evidence hackers have sought to compromise radio communications used to send launch approval messages, in an attempt to attack the nuclear submarines.
“By far the biggest fear and worst-case scenario is that hackers somehow compromise or sabotage the submarine or the weapons it carries,” Andrew Futter, senior lecturer in international politics at the University of Leicester wrote in an article for the ELN.
“UK submarines receive regular radio transmissions from ashore that could theoretically be attacked, such as weather updates needed for targeting and the regular FamilyGram…This will almost certainly involve malware introduced during the procurement phase while the submarine/missiles/warheads are being built, or when the submarine is in port for maintenance, refurbishment and software updates,” Dr Futter added.
“Given that the UK is likely on the cusp of building the next generation of nuclear-armed submarines, this challenge, and guarding against threats to the supply chain and overall maintenance, is particularly relevant now,” he reiterated.
Earlier in January, leader of UK Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn called for nuclear “de-escalation” in the UK, saying nukes should not be carried on submarines.
Corbyn said the UK could keep its controversial Trident submarine fleet but without carrying nuclear warheads.
The opposition leader is at odds with many of his MPs over the future of the UK nuclear weapons system.
Back in October, a report showed the overall costs for Britain to replace and maintain its controversial nuclear deterrent program could stand at around £167 billion ($256 billion) – a figure the critics say is far more than expected.
The Trident program was announced in July 1980. Since 1998, it has been the only British nuclear weapon system in service. Its stated purpose is to provide “the minimum effective nuclear deterrent as the ultimate means to deter the most extreme threat.”
Those opposed to the renewal of Trident say that the changing threats of global terrorism and climate change means that Britain does not need a hugely costly renewal of nuclear deterrents.
Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)
- Hillary Clinton Compares Trump Rallies to Hiter Rallies: “Trump Supporters Are Nazis” - September 24, 2022
- Woman Drops Dead at Pharmacy Minutes After Getting COVID Jab - September 24, 2022
- Creepy Biden Stuns Audience: “She Was 12, I Was 30 – We Go Back a Long Way” - September 24, 2022