Police are allowed to shoot and kill your dog if it moves “a few inches” or barks at them, a ruling from the 6th Circuit Court has decreed.
Mark and Cheryl Brown petitioned the appeals court to hold the city and police officers from Battle Creek, Mich., accountable for shooting and killing their dogs while executing a search warrant of their home looking for evidence of drugs.
One of the Brown’s dogs was shot for “moving a few inches” and the second for “just standing there, barking, turned sideways to the officers.”
“The standard we set out today is that a police officer’s use of deadly force against a dog while executing a warrant to search a home for illegal drug activity is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment when, given the totality of the circumstances and viewed from the perspective of an objectively reasonable officer, the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the court’s opinion.
Washington Examiner reports:
In the case of the Browns’ two pit bulls, the imminent threat came from the dogs barking and moving around. One officer shot the first pit bull after he said it “had only moved a few inches” in a movement that he considered to be a “lunge.” The injured dog retreated to the basement, where the officer shot and killed it as well as the second dog while conducting a sweep of the residence.
“Officer Klein testified that after he shot and killed the first dog, he noticed the second dog standing about halfway across the basement,” the court’s opinion explained. “The second dog was not moving towards the officers when they discovered her in the basement, but rather she was ‘just standing there,’ barking and was turned sideways to the officers. Klein then fired the first two rounds at the second dog.”
After the wounded dog ran into a back corner of the basement, another officer shot the dog rather than seeking help for it.
“Officer Case saw that ‘there was blood coming out of numerous holes in the dog, and … [Officer Case] didn’t want to see it suffer,’ so he put her out of her misery and fired the last shot,” Clay wrote.
The court decided that the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence showing the first dog did not lunge at police officers and that the second dog didn’t bark. Clay wrote that Mark Brown’s testimony that he didn’t hear any barking when the officers approached the residence did not have any impact on whether the dogs were a threat to the officers after they entered the house.
Latest posts by Baxter Dmitry (see all)
- Jerry Nadler: Standard Of Impeachment MUST CHANGE To Suit Our Case Against Trump - December 10, 2019
- ‘Why Let Him Cheat One More Time?’ Schiff Says Dems Won’t Accept 2020 Result If Trump Wins - December 10, 2019
- Lindsey Graham Slams ‘Unlawful’ FBI For Running ‘Criminal Enterprise’ Against a Duly Elected President - December 10, 2019