Filmmaker and accused pedophile Woody Allen visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘House of Horrors‘ in 2010 – two years after he was convicted for having sex with a child.
Woody Allen was seen exiting the child sex trafficker’s Manhattan townhouse after a December, 2010 party in honor of another accused pedophile, Prince Andrew.
Zerohedge.com reports: Allen and his wife, Soon-Yi Previn (who ex-wife Mia Farrow adopted when she was eight years old) were seen leaving the soire, however the two were spotted leaving the mansion on more than one occasion during Prince Andrew’s stay, according to the Daily Mail.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
In 2017, Allen’s adopted daughter Dylan Farrow wrote an open letter to the New York Times, accusing Allen of sexually abusing her when she was just 7 years old.
Soon-Yi came to Allen’s defense in a 2018 New York Magazine profile, calling Dylan Farrow’s accusations “so unjust.”
Farrow hit back, posting in a statement on Twitter “Woody Allen molested me when I was seven years old, part of a documented pattern of inappropriate, abusive touching that led a judge to say there was no evidence I was coached and that it was unsafe for me to be in Woody Allen’s presence.
As the Mail reports: “The December 2 dinner was held in the mansion’s second-floor dining room. TV anchor Katie Couric, once the highest-paid female presenter in the US, sat alongside comedian Chelsea Handler, a close friend of Gwyneth Paltrow and Jennifer Aniston. Also there was George Stephanopoulos, a former White House communications director under President Bill Clinton turned £15 million-a-year ABC News host.”
So we can add the above names to the list of people with no problem hanging out with a pedophile.
The soiree is believed to have also been attended by Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the disgraced media tycoon Robert Maxwell and Epstein’s one-time girlfriend.
Multiple Epstein accusers have claimed that Ms Maxwell ‘procured’ girls for the perverted millionaire. She denies the allegations.
Guests would have walked past bizarre erotic artwork en route to the dining room with its gleaming mahogany table, including a painting of Bill Clinton in red heels and a blue dress, a reference to the outfit worn by Monica Lewinsky when she performed a sex act on him. –Daily Mail
Sounds like quite the gathering…
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c6a7c24e43ef7fee27d524eaab5796748e22dc59ab1a1bf6150d8d124d77382a.jpg
Has anyone heard of Joseph Mengele……..you need to connect the torture he was doing on children at Auschwitz to what these elite pedo’s are doing to children. Their is certainly more at play here than just sex. It also should be noted that the kids Epstein was taking were much much younger than 16, the illuminati doesn’t want kids this old, as their goal is to program them from birth, and when a kid reaches a certain age (like 4), many parts of their minds will have already developed that hinder their trauma based mind control (certainly still possible, but more difficult). They raise children for the first 18 months with love and kindness, but once 18 months has ended the torture begins. They will have the same person who loved the child for 18 months begin the torture, as this starts the mind control as the child cant comprehend the person who loved them throwing them in a coffin filled with snakes for 5 hours. Imagine you were 3 years old and someone gave you LSD while you were watching a movie……this becomes more a reality than real life, and they create alternative realities for the children using Disney movies. Disneyland is one of the greatest bases for trauma based mind control, there are underground tunnels all throughout Disney. Walt Disney was a pedo who was owned by the illuminati through the mafia. He ran with the satanic rat pack as well, which was full of admitted satanists. JFK himself came from an illuminati family, he just quit listening so his shot clock expired. Back to the mind control, when you torture someone enough, the only way for them to survive is to develop amnesia walls, and distance themselves from the trauma they are enduring. Electro shock also serves in removing short term memory, so after a slave does a job they will be sure to shock him or her with a stun gun or cattle prong, etc. The whole goal here is to create programmed multiple personalities…….split there mind with torture, bring up particular personalities, program those personalities through drugs, hypnosis, and most importantly…..demonology
Lock the psychopath up unless pedophilia is not a crime in NYC?
I don’t know who ‘marries their adopted daughter’. Not Woody Allen. First, it is illegal. Second, he is married to the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow and André Previn. Hence her surname: Soon-Yi Previn.
And no, she is not his stepdaughter either, or ‘daughter’ in any other quality. Sorry if that simple fact troubles you.
Let me just add some facts.
1. Woody Allen is not an ‘accused pedophile’. No one has ever raised a formal accusation or charged him of any pedophile act. Mia Farrow made an ALLEGATION once, in 1992, at the height of their ugly separation & bitter custody battle. It was thoroughly investigated, by multiple expert parties from NY and CT, who ALL found the allegation non-credible. Indications were found that the young child had been ‘coached’ into telling the abuse narrative. So the prosecutor stood totally empty-handed, and decided to NOT prosecute. Hence no accusation or charge was made.
Also custody Judge Wilk has declared Allen could not be successfully prosecuted for this baseless allegation. Moreover, in 1999, NY Adoption Center judged that single allegation to be without merit when Allen and his wife wanted to adopt children. So he is NO pedophile and he is NOT accused. Mia and Dylan can still ‘accuse’ him in Court, if they want, as they have been able to do for 27 years, and can still do so until Dylan is 48. But they don’t, and they won’t. Ask yourself why.
2. The source of the above photo of Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Farrow leaving Epstein’s house is unclear. No reliable date is given, nor any occasion. In the article, some date and some occasion is simply attributed to the photo without even the least of evidence. The idea that they ‘leave a party’ is baseless, and the apparent daytime makes that not really credible. As an influential media mogul, Epstein must have had hundreds if not thousands of business partners visiting him in many years. That does not ‘prove’ any compliance of the visitors with Epstein’s criminal activities.
3. The phrase “two years after he was convicted for having sex with a child” is syntactically ambiguous, since it could be construed as relating to both Allen and Epstein. To be clear: it should relate to Epstein only. Allen was never even alleged for ‘having sex with a child’, let alone charged, let alone tried, let alone convicted. Allen has not been convicted of any crime in his long life. If that simple fact disappoints people, I am sorry for them.
4. The Daily Mail, referred to several times in the above article, has a dubious name as a source for celebrity news. The present Wikipedia says: “The Daily Mail has been widely criticised for its unreliability, as well as printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories of science and medical research, and for copyright violations.”
The tabloid has been criticized for “racism”, “homophobia”, “sexism” and obtaining controversial source materials.
“Other criticisms include the extent of coverage of celebrities, the children of celebrities, property prices, and the depiction of asylum seekers.”
“In February 2017, the English Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail as an “unreliable source” to use as a reference in Wikipedia. Its use as a reference is now “generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist”. Support for the ban centred on “the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication”.”
“In early 2019, the mobile version of the Microsoft Edge Internet browser started warning visitors to the MailOnline site, via its NewsGuard plugin, that “this website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability” and “has been forced to pay damages in numerous high-profile cases”.”
you are a sik fuk… and you will join them in hell… ffs man.. be ashamed of yourself … you are disgusting
Such an interesting reply. You probably find yourself a decent person, don’t you?
Pitiful excuse for mental illness.
Facts do not need any excuse. They are just facts.