On Saturday, New York’s Democratic Socialist darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for the abolition of the “racist” Electoral College. A few days later, she revealed her grand plan to undermine the U.S. Supreme Court. While her plan may not be very original or very smart, it does provide an insight into the modern socialist mind, and that glimpse is deeply disturbing.
At a screening for Michael Moore’s new film Fahrenheit 11/9, a member of the liberal audience asked Ocasio-Cortez what she would do if the Supreme Court confirmed all of Democrats’ fears.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
“If, in a few months from now, the Supreme Court looks like … a court that would overturn Roe [v. Wade] and make the president above the rule of law, what is to be done?” the audience member asked New York’s newly elected congresswoman.
20 Year Old Warning From Alex Jones: “NWO Planning Global Pandemic”
Ex-Cop Killed By Buffalo Shooter Had Just Invented 'Water Powered Car'
World Economic Forum to ‘ABOLISH’ Free Speech Globally
Pentagon: ‘UFO’s Are Real, You Will See More of Them’ – Stunning Admission
Democrats Say Men Can Now Get Abortions Too
Rothschild Slams Elon Musk For Saying He Won’t Vote Democrat Anymore
Freudian Slip! George W. Bush Slams the ‘Unjustified Invasion of Iraq’
Pedophile ‘Code Words’ Found in Hunter Biden’s Leaked Emails
Buffalo Killer’s Goal Was To ‘Remove Gun Rights’ in US
Socialist starlet Ocasio-Cortez, never one to put American institutions ahead of her own activist ambitions, took a page straight out of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s thoroughly discredited playbook.
“I think we take back the House, we take back the Senate, we take back the presidency, and we pack the Supreme Court of the United States of America,” she quipped. Then, as if this answer were clear, straightforward, and unproblematic, she flippantly added, “Next!”
PJMedia reports: In 1937, FDR announced just this kind of Court-packing plan. The Supreme Court found some of his New Deal government expansion unconstitutional, so FDR wanted to remake the Court. If the separation of powers stood in the way of big government, FDR was going to get rid of the separation of powers.
He presented the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, a bill to add more justices to the Supreme Court. Three weeks after FDR went public with this plan, the Supreme Court reversed course, bowing to the Democrats and the New Deal. This judicial sea-change went down in history as “the switch in time that saved nine.” While some historians have disputed this connection, the Court did indeed reverse course on the New Deal after FDR’s threat.
This is not the first time Ocasio-Cortez has aimed her wrath at an American institution that stood in the way of her activism. As previously mentioned, the socialist tweeted, “It is well past time we eliminate the Electoral College, a shadow of slavery’s power on America today that undermines our nation as a democratic republic.”
It is well past time we eliminate the Electoral College, a shadow of slavery’s power on America today that undermines our nation as a democratic republic. https://t.co/00HZN3MI6F
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Ocasio2018) October 6, 2018
The Success of Socialist Candidates Would Mean a Return to Poverty and Tyranny
This is historically false. The Electoral College was created to give small population states more say in the federal government. This helped states like Delaware, Rhode Island, Georgia, and Vermont gain more of a say to balance large population states like Virginia (by far the most populous state at the time of the founding), Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Massachusetts, and New York.
According to the 1790 census, free states had higher population than slave states, and there also were more free states than slave states. The Electoral College made no difference between them.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, counted a slave as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation. This enabled slave states to have more representation in Congress — but less than they wanted (they wanted to count slaves as full persons, which would have given them more power). Ironically, it was good for slaves that they were not counted as full persons for this purpose, but still horrifically tragic that slave states were able to use them as a political bargaining chip.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has shown her disdain for American institutions, based on a false understanding of history. If she had power, she would destroy America’s federal system by abolishing the Electoral College and packing the Supreme Court. Yet more and more liberals are blaming the system for their political losses, suggesting that the Senate — never intended to be democratic — isn’t democratic enough!
None of this should be surprising, however. After all, Woodrow Wilson, a major founder of progressivism, wrote that the Congress should have all the power when he saw himself as an excellent potential legislator but changed his tune when he became president. That’s convenient…
Progressivism is about taking power and using it, American institutions be damned. Democratic socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are even more brazen. Sure, let’s pack the courts, no brainer.