The Kremlin have issued a disturbing report this week that says President Obama has embarked on a “master plan” that aims to completely corrupt the electorate of the United States, which threatens to destroy America as we know it.
According to the report, the Obama administration is fighting a US Supreme Court case that aims to thwart his ‘communist agenda’ for America.
President Obama currently is the head of the most powerful Western nation in the world that a recent Princeton University study confirmed has ceased to be a democracy and is now an oligarchy [a small group of people having control of a country]—but due to the “traditional/conservative” population of America, these oligarchs “communistic agenda” has been thwarted resulting in a “completely polarized” American nation whose majority conservative population (Red States) are now being ruled from its elite East-West coast regions (Blue States) with neither of them being able to overcome the other.
The reason underlying the Red State-Blue State polarization of America, this report explains, is due to the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution—specifically Section 2—that for over two centuries has decided the makeup of the American electorate and the representatives elected to both State and Federal government positions and has given a disproportionate amount of power to cities over rural areas.
Upon his taking office in 2009, this report continues, President Obama began exploiting this disproportional scheme caused by a constitutional ambiguity [uncertainty or inexactness of meaning in language] of Section 2 of the 14th Amendment by flooding the United States with as many refugees and illegal aliens as possible—with his knowing that under current US law, these “non-Americans” are given the exact same rights to representation as American citizens.
Seeking to stop President Obama’s “master plan” to destroy the American electorate so his oligarchs can fully enact their “communistic agenda” though, this report notes, is a non-profit legal defense fund called Project on Fair Representation who in 2014 filed a lawsuit against him– Evenwel v. Abbott—and whose issue to be decided by the US Supreme Court states: “Whether the three-judge district court correctly held that the “one-person, one-vote” principle under the Equal Protection Clause allows States to use total population, and does not require States to use voter population, when apportioning state legislative districts.”
The difference between “total population” and “voter population” in selecting representatives as citied in this monumental case, this report explains, is the “loophole” President Obama has used in flooding America with illegal non-voters because when the “total population” metric is used the “voter population” can be completely overwhelmed and their rights taken away by sheer numbers.
To the shock of President Obama and his oligarch allies, this report further notes, the US Supreme Court this past spring agreed to hear and decide this case after having failed to address this issue for the past 25 years—and which led to the New York Times this past May (2015) stating, in part, about it:
“The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear a case that will answer a long-contested question about a bedrock principle of the American political system: the meaning of “one person one vote.”
The court’s ruling, expected in 2016, could be immensely consequential. Should the court agree with the two Texas voters who brought the case, its ruling would shift political power from cities to rural areas, a move that would benefit Republicans.
The court has never resolved whether voting districts should have the same number of people, or the same number of eligible voters. Counting all people amplifies the voting power of places with large numbers of residents who cannot vote legally, including immigrants who are here legally but are not citizens, illegal immigrants, children and prisoners. Those places tend to be urban and to vote Democratic.
A ruling that districts must be based on equal numbers of voters would move political power away from cities, with their many immigrants and children, and toward older and more homogeneous rural areas.”
President Obama’s hatred and disdain of America’s “older and more homogeneous rural areas”, this report notes, was put on full display in 2008 while as he was running for the presidency when he was captured on tape saying about them: “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Though the US Supreme Court has yet to give their final ruling in this case, this report continues, President Obama appears to believe he will win—and as evidenced by the over 34 million “green cards” and “work permits” he has ordered his government to create for another flood of illegal aliens that will completely overwhelm the rights of whatever American citizens remain once his full “master plan” is implemented.
To what America will become then, this report concludes, one need look no further than the European Union—whose current illegal migration crisis has turned modern-day Europe into a “medieval mess” leading many experts to warn that the “fall of Europe” is nearly upon us all—and the United States will quickly follow.