An Obama-appointed Judge has tossed out the Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to block Pennsylvania from certifying its election result.
US District Judge of the United States District Court for Pennsylvania, Matthew Brann, predictably dismissed Trump’s lawsuit and claimed it would “disenfranchise almost 7 million voters.”
The Trump campaign argued the equal protection clause in their lawsuit, however the corrupt Obama judge shot back and declared, “That some counties may have chosen to implement the guidance (or not), or to implement it differently, does not constitute an equal protection violation.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: “This court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter.”
Judge Brann said Trump’s legal team “was not armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.”
President Trump was up by nearly 700,000 votes on election night in Pennsylvania when the crooked Democrat officials suspended vote counting.
Within 48 hours following Election Day, the crooked Secretary of State admitted there were millions of ballots that needed to be counted.
GOP observers were blocked from watching ballot counters in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani alleges 680,000+ ballots were counted for Joe Biden without GOP observers present.
Joe Biden leads in Pennsylvania by approximately 70,000 votes after elections officials continued to count ballots for more than 2 weeks after Election Day.
