A new report has been released by Greenpeace outlining the environmental and health impacts of the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
The reports also warns of long-term consequences lasting decades and possible even centuries.
Stressing there is “no end in sight” to the ecological fallout, the NGO says the impact in a number of areas will continue, which will include but not be limited to mutations in trees, DNA-damaged worms and butterflies, as well as radiation-contaminated mountain water tables.
“The government’s massive decontamination program will have almost no impact on reducing the ecological threat from the enormous amount of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Already, over 9 million cubic meters of nuclear waste are scattered over at least 113,000 locations across Fukushima prefecture,” said Kendra Ulrich, Senior nuclear campaigner at Greenpeace Japan.
— Greenpeace Japan (@gpjen) March 4, 2016
The study based on five years of independent scientific research in addition to 25 radiological investigations by Greenpeace radiation specialists paint a dire picture. The impact from the 2011 disaster are already becoming apparent, the environmental group says. These are seen in the high radiation concentrations in new leaves, and growth mutations of fir trees and pale blue grass butterfly mutations.
Based on scientific studies, Greenpeace also notes decreases in 57 bird species and high levels of cesium contamination in freshwater fish. The NGO is raising the alarm regarding the contamination of coastal estuaries as well.
Greenpeace warns against the government’s decision to lift a number of evacuation orders around the Fukushima plant by March 2017. The NGO says the International Atomic Energy Agency and the government are operating under “deeply flawed assumptions” when it comes to decontamination and ecosystem risks.
“The Abe government is perpetuating a myth that five years after the start of the nuclear accident the situation is returning to normal. The evidence exposes this as political rhetoric, not scientific fact. And unfortunately for the victims, this means they are being told it is safe to return to environments where radiation levels are often still too high and are surrounded by heavy contamination,” Ulrich said.
Based on the 56-page report the environmental advocacy group believes that around 100,000 people won’t be able to return home in the immediate future.
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- Biden Claims Two Thirds Of US Population Have Died Of Coronavirus - September 21, 2020
- Prof. Neil Ferguson, Who Violated His Own Quanatine Rules, Says Another UK Lockdown May Be Needed Again Soon - September 21, 2020
- Bill Clinton Calls President Trump’s Decision To Replace Ginsburg A ‘Superficially Hypocritical Call’ - September 20, 2020