A UN panel that ruled this week that the herbicide glyphosate was probably ‘not carcinogenic to humans’ has become embroiled in a bitter row about potential conflicts of interests.
It has emerged that two people on the UN panel have ties to groups that have accepted over $1 million from Monsanto and another industry group representing agrochemical giants.
The people are Professor Alan Boobis, chairman of the UN panel investigating glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup and other similar products, and Professor Angelo Moretto, the panel’s co-chair, the Guardian reported:
Professor Alan Boobis, who chaired the UN’s joint FAO/WHO meeting on glyphosate, also works as the vice-president of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Europe. The co-chair of the sessions was Professor Angelo Moretto, a board member of ILSI’s Health and Environmental Services Institute, and of its Risk21 steering group too, which Boobis also co-chairs.
In 2012, the ILSI group took a $500,000 (£344,234) donation from Monsanto and a $528,500 donation from the industry group Croplife International, which represents Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta and others, according to documents obtained by the US right to know campaign.
Alan Boobis said: “My role in ILSI (and two of its branches) is as a public sector member and chair of their boards of trustees, positions which are not remunerated. The boards of trustees are responsible for oversight of the organisations and their scientific programmes.”
But the news sparked furious condemnation from green MEPs and NGOs, intensified by the report’s release two days before an EU relicensing vote on glyphosate, which will be worth billions of dollars to industry.
Vito Buonsante, a lawyer for the ClientEarth group, said: “There is a clear conflict of interest here if the review of the safety of glyphosate is carried out by scientists that directly get money from industry. This study cannot in any way be reliably considered when deciding whether to approve glyphosate.”
The Green MEP Bart Staes said: “The timing of the release of this report by the FAO/WHO could be described as cynical, if it weren’t such a blatantly political and ham-fisted attempt to influence the EU decision later this week on the approval of glyphosate.”
The WHO says that from its side, the timing of the report’s release so close to the EU decision was coincidental, and was decided several months ago.
The non-governmental environmental organization Greenpeace have also questioned the UN panel ruling in a statement, where they say ISLI and its Health and Environmental gets most of its funding from private companies, including glyphosate producers.
Franziska Achterberg , the Greenpeace EU food policy director said:
“Any decision affecting millions of people should be based on fully transparent and independent science that isn’t tied to corporate interests. It would be irresponsible to ignore the warnings on glyphosate and to re-licence this pesticide without any restrictions to protect the public and the environment.”
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- Chris Wallace Blasted Over Blatant Bias In Favour Of Joe Biden During Debate - September 30, 2020
- Joe Biden Won’t Condemn Antifa Because He’s Beholden To The Radical LeftSays Nigel Farage - September 30, 2020
- Hillary Clinton Accused Of Approving Plan To Smear Trump With Russia Accusations & Distract From Her Own Scandals - September 30, 2020