Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has called for civil war in the United States, demanding “marching“, “blood” and “death” in the streets until President Trump is dragged from office, in a chilling video posted to her Facebook page.
In the short and punchy video, Loretta Lynch begins by claiming that people are experiencing “great fear and uncertainty,” with the unstated implication that it is the President of the United States, Donald Trump, she is referring to.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Appearing nervous and exhausted, Lynch goes on to say that “our rights” are “being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back.” However despite the high emotion and fear mongering, the former Attorney General is unable to offer a single example of her claims.
The most shocking part of Lynch’s short speech comes when she urges Americans to take to the streets, declaring the answer to Trump lies in civil disobedience, violence and death. “We have done this before,” she said, “and we can do it again.”
The most shocking words in Lynch’s short speech come when she urges Americans to take to the streets, declaring the answer to Trump lies in civil disobedience, violence and death.
“I know that this is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people,” Lynch says. “I know it’s a time of concern for people, who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy. We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers.”
“It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.”
The video was later posted to the Senate Democrats Facebook page as “words of inspiration”, suggesting that Democratic Party HQ is not viewing Lynch’s video as the embarrassing late-night work of a tired and emotional former civil servant, but rather as a rallying call for progressives across the country to march and sacrifice their blood and lives for the cause.
The timing of the call-to-arms has also raised eyebrows. Released late at night after a day of revelations concerning her former boss, Barack Obama, and his alleged “worse than Watergate” wiretapping of Trump Tower during the 2016 election, it seems that nervous, exhausted Loretta Lynch knows the gloves are coming off and the crimes of the Obama administration are going to be exposed one by one.
Baxter Dmitry
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Cmon newswire…cut this shit out….. I can sees she not taking her medication… but she said nothing like what you are alluding to… seriously…you are starting to give the honest media a bad name with your loose ended innuendo lately…
Yes, “Shedid..” You absolutely are right, and I, too, call on NewsWire to STOP exaggerating events especially in the headlines. You are LOSING CREDIBILITY FAST.
However, “Shedid..” Loretta, being a lawyer, chose her words very carefully with; “We can do this again.” While this sentence is not connected to a call to act against Trump specifically, it will cause many readers to INFER that meaning. No, she is not off her meds, but rather an articulate and very dangerous threat to Mr.T.
Lynch’s motives may not be political, but I don’t see anything wrong in her video, and she doesn’t look awful like the picture suggests. It’s just a short clip saying that people should be willing to protest for their rights. She doesn’t criticize and specific person or platform by name.
“Protest” has one connotation. “Blood in the streets” has another. You fail to see the difference.
Lynch is vague in her complaints. We can all agree on that. It’s news that the just recently retired head of the DOJ has emphatic but vague complaints about the US legal system in general. Is she talking about targeted extra-judicial killing of US citizens? Is she talking about the top secret FISA court where the FBI collaborates with the secret court to gain orders for “surveillance” that, as a practical matter, essentially end the normal part of the target’s life? The FBI plans to “get” their target, one way or another, claiming it’s all above board when it almost never is in reality. Is she talking about the withdrawal of Federal watchdog protections for voting rights, environment, etc? Is she talking about abuses in private, profit making prison systems that are being increasingly used, the owners of which are increasingly prominent campaign contributors? Is she talking about the militarization of local police, where SWAT teams are now being routinely called for minor incidents and the rate of accidental civilian homicide by police is skyrocketing?
I don’t know the answers? I’d rather learn more rather than circulate false claims that she is inciting riots and looks very sick.
Josh, Lynch did not speak out about your above stated misspractices by Federal government under the Clinton/Obama (and before that Bush) regimes…. so I’m suspecting she just doesn’t like the reforms that Trump is doing by attempting to roll back some of Obama’s abuses of power.
I think it’s hard to say. FBI agents (also DOJ) are not allowed to script their own burps on mic, for the record – yet I came across this piece earlier today by a former FBI guy who is a regular chatterbox of conspiracy suspicions: http://niagarafallsreporter.com/dilaura-senior-fbi-agents-interview-obamas-black-ops-team/ What is the real dirt Lynch knows about and what does she really think about it? I see that as a big unknown.
I received a DISQUS email claiming a comment was posted saying “”Protest” has one connotation. “Blood in the streets” has another. You fail to see the difference.” I can’t find the comment on-line to reply to, so perhaps it was deleted. In any case, I interpreted Lynch’s remarks to mean “Historically, protesters fighting injustice do often get hurt. To succeed, they often need the fortitude to continue after being hurt, even bloodied, to reach their goals.” I didn’t interpret her meaning as “Enhance your protest by creating blood in the streets.”
If that is really what she said, then she should be put in Jail
Lock her ass up for inciting a riot and treason.
hang her for treason…..period
Sounds 1772… only idiots believe there are two parties… wait and see what Trump really does… He is already stripping freedoms, but his trumpettes are too blind to see it… He will finish what was started in 1901…
Time for beddie-bye Dan. Your head is heavy and you are in way over your head here.
TRAITOR DAN yeah that works well TRAITOR DAN SMITH!
What a sleazy, conniving liar bitch this stupid ex-Attorney General has turned out to be!
This was our Attorney General? That’s the scariest thing of all, how do we let these idiots into office? This could not be more misguided, misinformed, and just plain wrong on every level. Down comes the house of cards.
She was an “Acting” Attorney General, which means that when Holder left, Obama could pick anyone he wanted without confirmation as long as they were called “Acting”. That’s how this evil racist witch got in.
Armed force will be necessary to put these criminals down. They are not civil nor rational and therefore no productive discussion is possible with them. Arrest, try and sentence these sociopaths.
Agreed and just wow. That this oxygen wasting POS was once AG for the United States? Shows what a corrupt and sick presidency will do to a country. Does this crazy swine also advocate that muslims be able to throw acid on the faces of women who don’t wear a headbag?
She’s inciting a riot and violence. When do these people start going to jail?
Communists dieing on our streets?
Works for me!
She should be tried and executed for High Treason.
If she has a trial before she’s hanged, no one can say she was ‘lynched’
LOCK HER UP!
Watch Lynch express her loathing for Trump and then remind yourself that she and Billy Clinton ONLY discussed their grandchildren during their highly inappropriate meeting on the tarmac before the election. Also…how is this video NOT an act of sedition?
Lock’em up.
It wouldn’t surprise me to find out that Soros is paying her to come out with such stupidity. I’m 70 years old and I live in Alabama and have lived here most of my life, and I think the blacks here have figured out that the globalists are the ones who are trying to stir up racial tension, and now they are no longer falling for it. I hope the same is the case in inner city areas of the big cities.
S-E-D-I-T-I-O-N ! –advocating and aiding the overthrow of the duly elected and standing government of the united states of America is a capital offence.
Lynch has taken a big step over the line!
What a Jesus complex! I wonder if I turned an M-60 machine gun on her if she could walk across the bullets.
when the war starts you the first to go
I wonder, If she’s calling for blood on the streets maybe they should start with her blood! seditious bitch!!
Bring it on..I will start by kicking your teeth in ape woman
I bet if got her bloody ape face under my boot she would eat those words as I shove her cut off arm up her butt sideways
OH COME ON !!!!
I
won’t speculate on what she had in her evil little heart when she said
those words but I can say for sure that those who leap to the ASSumption
she was advocating war are lying because they can’t read her mind any
better than me.
This
headline is EXACTLY the type of overblown idiocy the DEMs use on us.
Jumping on every wrong word or poor turn of phrase with the worst
possible interpretation.
We have seen a HUGE shift in ppl moving FROM the left to sanity because of the left’s constant lies.
ARE YOU TRYING TO SEND THEM BACK????
How about we don’t act like those lying scumbags?
How
about we use integrity and honesty and stick to the facts so those who
are decent humans can pick our side out of the mess and join us.
If this doesn’t make sense to you, then you probably are on the wrong side.
Founding Fathers? I think maybe she’s referring to Marx, Lenin, Stallin, and Alenski?
This is not new. What is surprising is that I have never seen this on the news before. The Democrats are pretty confident in advocating physical confrontations against those who disagree with them. They’re scared. They are guilty of so many crimes. The call for “equal” treatment under the law is appropriate. Laws have been broken. It is time for the Democrats to be treated just like any other law breakers.