Historians Confirm Karl Marx Was Employed By The Rothschilds

Fact checked
Historians prove Karl Marx was related to the Rothschilds

Historians have confirmed that Karl Marx was not only related to the Rothschilds, but was also employed as their agent in order to subvert democracy and corrupt the Socialist movement.

Karl Marx was born in a London squalor, and came from a long line of rabbis.

Henrymakow.com reports: He used to visit the Red Lion Pub at Great Windmill Street, Soho where he and Friedrich Engels were asked to write what became the Communist Manifesto. His best known work is the book Das Kapital, which fails to mention that money is printed out of thin air and by his cousins, the Rothschilds.

BACKGROUND

Karl Heinrich Marx was born in Trier, Kingdom of Prussia on 5 May 1818, an Ashkenazi, to Hirschel Mordechai and Henriette Pressburg. Marx’s birth name name is Chaim Hirschel Mordechai. Marx descended from Talmudic rabbis; his paternal ancestors had provided rabbis to Trier since 1723, a post last held by his grandfather.

During the Napoleonic War of the Sixth Coalition, [Marx’s father] Hirschel Mordechai became a Freemason in 1813, joining their Loge L’Ètoile anséatique (The Hanseatic Star) in Osnabrück. After the war, he feigned conversion to Lutheranism as a means to better infiltrate Prussian society. He pretended to be an “assimilated” bourgeois Enlightenment liberal, interested in “free thought” and was wealthy, owning some Moselle vineyards.

One of Marx’s grandparents was Nanette Salomon Barent-Cohen, who belonged to a wealthy Amsterdam family. Her cousin had married Nathan Mayer Rothschild and bore Lionel Nathan Rothschild, “Baron” and Member of Parliament for the City of London.

Karl Marx was brought up by his family to hate Jesus Christ…

BLOODLINES

                                    Barent-Cohen of Amsterdam --- ?
                                        (* c. 1710)   |
                                                      |
                                            --------------------
                                            |                  |
                           Sara       Salomon  David         Levi             Lydia
                          Brandes ---  Barent-Cohen      Barent-Cohen --- Diamantschleifer
                                   |     (†1807)         (1747-1808)   |
                                   |                                   |
         Isaac             Nanette Salomon                          Hannah       Nathan Mayer
    Heijmans Pressburg ---   Barent-Cohen                        Barent-Cohen --- Rothschild
       (1747-1832)      |    (1764-1833)                         (1783-1850)   |  (1777-1836)
                        |                                                      |
      Hirschel      Henriette                      Charlotte                Lionel
      Mordechai --- Pressburg                Baronin von Rotschild --- Baron de Rothschild
     (1777-1838) | (1788-1863)                   (1819-1884)        |     (1808-1879)
                 |                                                  | 
             Karl Marx                      Emma Louise      Nathan Mayer
            (1818-1883)                    von Rotschild --- de Rothschild
                                            (1844-1935)   |   (1840-1915)
                                                          |
                                              Lionel Walter Rothschild   →   Balfour Declaration
                                                      (1868-1937)

ROTHSCHILD AGENT?

Critics have suggested that Marx’s mission was to co opt the nascent socialist movement. Before Marx ever wrote a word, following the industrial revolution,  the socialist movement already existed in Germany, France, Britain and elsewhere. Marxists have tried to monopolize socialism and insist that unless you follow Marx’s theories, you cannot be a socialist. This is a clear fraud and usurpation.

A major question in this regard, is “who was behind Marx?” The book Der preußische Regierungsagent Karl Marx by Wolfgang Waldner, suggests that initially Marx worked as a police spy for the Prussian regime.

Waldner mentions the fact that Marx married Jenny von Westphalen in 1843. She came from a wealthy Prussian family. Her brother was Ferdinand von Westphalen, who was Prussian Minister of the Interior from 1850-1858. Ferdinand, Marx’s brother-in-law, was regarded as  “reactionary”, who ran a vast spy network which kept tabs on dissidents…

Marx moved to London in 1849…While Marx was authoring Das Kapital in the British Museum reading room, his famous cousin Lionel de Rothschild, conveniently, was MP for the City of London (1847-1868 & 1869-1874).

The Rothschilds (Marx’s third cousin by blood) and other finance syndicates were very prominent in promoting “Jewish emancipation”  and Masonic, liberal and Protestant ideas which took hold of society at the start of the 19th century….

The idea of Marx as a Rothschild shill…was raised as a concern by his contemporary rival in the First International, Mikhail Bakunin in 1869, who was not even aware of the fact that Marx and Rothschild were cousins. Bakunin wrote presciently:

“This world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralization of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found. “
Mikhail Bakunin, Profession de foi d’un démocrate socialiste russe précédé d’une étude sur les juifs allemands, 1869.

RUSSIA

Perhaps the most pronounced and consistent aspect of Marx’s ideology was his extreme and radical hatred of Russia [the last bastion of Christian civilization…]… He and Engels regarded Russians and Slavs in general as subhuman (völkerabfall) barbarians. Had he lived to see his ideological heirs Vladimir Lenin,✡ Leon Trotsky,✡ Grigory Zinoviev✡ butcher them by the millions, he would no doubt have cackled in orgasmic joy at the horrors visited upon them; men, women and children.

Marx used the newspaper Neue Rheinische Zeitung to try and incite a war against Russia. This Russophobia was also behind the strange alliance with Tory, David Urquhart, when he moved to London and Marx thus has the blood of the people who died in the Crimean War on his hands. Henry Hyndman, who spent many hours in Marx’s company in his Record of an Adventurous Life attributed this anti-Russian obsession to Marx’s ethnocentrism. The Soviets tried to cover up this fact about Marx…

36 Comments

  1. they hated russia because the tsars expelled the Hews , into the Pale, and because Tsar Alexander supported President McKinley and sent the Russian navy to his aid preventing the french and English from invading America totally colonialising her .And because Russia was so self sufficient and so immensely wealthy Also because the Yussupof Family ,who had ruled the Islamic world for centuries ,together married into the German and Russian royal houses would become the most powerful wealthiest family on Earth .Already were the wealthiest on earth ,even wealthier than the Tsar ,and Felix, the murderer of Rasputin was the sole heir after his elder brother was killed fighting a duel over a “wallis simpson” style of actress .They would not accept any of that .They who so desperately believe they are the rightful owners of the Universe.

  2. Marx and Engel borrowed heavily from Adam Weishaupt, a Rothschild Illuminati Jesuit. The Jesuits began their experimentation in socialism in South America where they established communes forcing natives to work in camps. The real discussion needs to be focused on banking theory, interest theory, and corban,

    • What effect will that have on the Rothschild-promoted Moloch-Baal worship that’s the basis of child sacrifice; the satanic perversion that’s responsible for YHWH’s exile of the Jews from the promised land that’s still in effect today.

  3. It is good to know that the Rothschild’s support “Jewish emancipation” and that means they can have their own Territory, Bank, Schools, Religious Institutions, Representatives in Congress etc. and not have any CRIMINALS PILLAGING THEIR TAXES.

  4. Marx was born in Trier, not London, and if this passes as “history” standards have fallen WAY too low.

  5. Marx’s father conversion to Lutheranism was genuine. He became a staunch Prussian patriot. In fact, he often wondered in letters why his son acted in the rages and fits that he did. So he didn’t raise his son to hate Jesus; that hatred came on Marx’s own volition.

    Second, about that family tree. It just doesn’t sit right to me. Marx was known for his hatred of Jews, despite being one himself. He was aware that all they loved was money, so even if he was a cousin of the Rothschilds, he would have condemned their actions and positions of power.

    Third, Lenin was not fully Jewish. He was 1/4 Jewish, and yes, the Soviet authorities knew at the time. They also knew Marx’s hatred of Slavs and how you don’t have to worship Marx to be a socialist. But hey, you gotta have that USSR Holocaust.

    • Terribly so. The author deleted my comment. Ironic when the upholders of free speech can’t tolerate free speech.

  6. Who instigate the Opium War against China ? The British super elite.

    Who instigate Cold War against the Soviet ? The British super elite.

    Who created NATO ? The British super elite.

    Who create IMF, World Bank, BIS ? The British super elite.

    Who looted Russia after the collapse of Soviet ? The British super elite.

    Who looted India & Africa ? The British super elite.

    Who prevented Germany from cooperating with Russia ? The British super elite.

    Who set up Karl Marx to write communism which launched the Bolshevik Revolution ? The British super elite.

    England is ruled by the same deep state assholes that rule the US.

    The globalist movement is an alliance based on self-interest of the private international financiers and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of Britain, Europe and America which over the years have intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that through lies and deception seeks to control everything and everyone on earth.

    The British Establishment are still colonialists at heart. The rest of the world is there to be exploited, and no-one does it better than the pillagers running the City of London. The connections between the City, the Vatican and Washington D.C. are well known.

    The City runs the finance, the Vatican controls religion, and the US offers the brawn i.e. the military might.

    • A bit simplistic interpretation of history. Yes the British were very systematic in how they exploited other races but the ruling elite was part of a network which extended over Europe and were all practicing the same forms of exploitation.

      I wouldn’t say you are wrong when you write: “The British Establishment are still colonialists at heart” And the top 1% are entitled sociopaths.

      • Who own Google/Apple/Amazon and Facebook and other Big Tech ? Find out the real owners and you will be surprised.

        The oligarchs and political rulers of US are predator humans whose will bristles swell when they can torture people through wars which also offer the opportunity to destroy their properties and loot.

        1688 “revolution” was really the takeover of UK by globalists, Amsterdam Satanists moved to UK with billions in today’s money from European aristocracy, took over BoE and funded “empire” all was organized under a masonic hierarchy in course of 18th, Rothschilds officially had coming out with Waterloo bet but had been in game for a long time before (managed plundered German aristocratic fortunes). The UK is not english people there are mere subjects and are kept down through language barrier, poor education and race admixing.

        If you ignore masonic history then you ignore real history and therefore reality. The rest is fiction and moot.

        • Nathan Rothschild was not at Waterloo. There was no storm in the English Channel. You deal in crackpot gibberish. But at least you have free speech on this page. The author deleted my comment so he does not believe in free speech, only selective speech that advances his agenda. All of you crackpots are like that. Complete and utter frauds.

          • Can you please provide website link to your interesting claims ?
            We all want to learn the facts from you.

          • The claim about Nathan Rothschild? Better yet, why don’t people stop making and spreading unfounded claims, how about some evidence for their claims? There is none because Nathan Rothschild was not at Waterloo. This has been debunked over and over by numerous entities. The burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim, whatever the claim is. The fact that the author deleted my comment elsewhere in this thread is pretty damning of a knowingly crackpot liar with a hateful agenda, I’d say.

      • You are partial right.
        So can you please provide info who are the real owners of Google/Apple/Amazon and Facebook ? Are they nameless hiding behind proxies ?

    • Karl Marx did not WRITE communism. He was not the father of communism. Communist thinkers and socialist thinkers existed long before him. He gave the best critique of CAPITALISM we have. He was not a globalist, he PREDICTED GLOBALISM. The British did not produce the Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolsheviks were hardly known until it was their policies that drew the people’s support. But there was financial support going to the Tsar and to the provisional Kerensky government before the Bolsheviks came to power. They were a liberal government who could not deliver the promises to the people they made, they in effect were keeping the status quo of the Tsar. After the Bolsheviks came to power, they repudiate all foreign debt. Does that sound like they were supported by the British super elite? Or any other elite? Super elite/bankers, etc. are the antithesis of what the Bolsheviks stood for. No group with any financial interest in anything wants to support a movement that would take their power away. First thing Lenin did was nationalize the banks and repudiate the foreign debt.

      • Thank you for your input.
        Please provide website links that support your claims above.
        How much debt did Tsar Russia owed to the British ?
        The British used the communism Bolsheviks to get rid of Tsar Russia.

        [[[[[[[[[[[
        City of London Corporation, never got over Russia saving the Union during the Civil War.
        [[[[[[[
        Russia and the United States: The Forgotten History of a Brotherhood
        The Roots of Russian-US Relations

        President Lincoln was given the go ahead to publicise Russia’s support for the Union and this was sufficient to cause Britain and France to step back.

        The second critical phase would occur during the summer of 1863. By then, the South’s invasion of the North had failed at Gettysburg and the violent anti-war New York draft riots also failed.
        Britain was once again thinking of a direct military intervention.

        What would follow marks one of the greatest displays of support for another country’s sovereignty to ever occur in modern history.

        Czar Alexander II, who held sole power to declare war for Russia stated in an interview to the American banker Wharton Barker on Aug. 17, 1879 (Published in The Independent March 24, 1904):
        “In the Autumn of 1862, the governments of France and Great Britain proposed to Russia, in a formal but not in an official way, the joint recognition by European powers of the independence of the Confederate States of America.

        My immediate answer was:
        `I will not cooperate in such action; and I will not acquiesce. On the contrary, I shall accept the recognition of the independence of the Confederate States by France and Great Britain as a casus belli for Russia. And in order that the governments of France and Great Britain may understand that this is no idle threat; I will send a Pacific fleet to San Francisco and an Atlantic fleet to New York.

        …All this I did because of love for my own dear Russia, rather than for love of the American Republic. I acted thus because I understood that Russia would have a more serious task to perform if the American Republic, with advanced industrial development were broken up and Great Britain should be left in control of most branches of modern industrial development.”

        It was therefore very much due to Russia’s dedicated display of solidarity with Lincoln’s Union that Britain and France did not intervene and the country was able to piece itself together. Lincoln referred to the Russian support in his Thanksgiving Proclamation as “God’s bounties of so extraordinary a nature that they cannot fail to penetrate the heart.”

  7. are there any connections between marxism and illuminati weishaupt ? because they both state abolition of religion and private property as goals, not

    • No. The Illuminati were long before Marx’s time. Marx and Engels developed dialectical materialism, a philosophical approach to reality derived that states the material world, perceptible to the senses, has objective reality independent of mind or spirit. Marxism advocates the class struggle. The Illuminati had nothing to do with these concepts.

  8. Marx was not related to Rothschild in any appreciable way, i.e. third cousin? I don’t even know my third cousins and the ones I know I don’t desire to have anything to do with. Even if he had been close kin, so what? Marx was deeply opposed to the financial bourgeoisie to which the Rothschilds belonged. Bakunin was an antisemite and so equated some bankers that were Jewish with the rule of Jews in general (like antisemitic conspiracy circles today). This was a common form of antisemitism during the 19th century because several of the largest banks in the world were owned by Jewish families, such as Rothschild and Sons. Such racist claims ignored that other large banks at the time were not owned by Jewish families, such as Barings. In the 19th century, and today, the majority of Jews were/are not bankers or members of the ruling classes. Jewish workers do not benefit from the fact that some bankers happen to be Jewish. This is no different to the fact that workers who are Christians or atheists do not benefit from the fact that some bankers happen to be Christians or atheists. Bakunin’s antisemitism was not remarkable for the 19th century. Bakunin lived in an antisemitic society and so expressed antisemitic views, despite the fact that he was also raised in a patriarchal society but unlearnt this to a significant extent and advocated for woman’s emancipation. Bakunin, et al, internalized the prejudices of his time, but he was responsible for not noticing and unlearning them.

  9. Suggestions and speculations, but no actual evidence to confirm the very big claim that Marx was ’employed by the Rothschilds.

  10. Other historians had already said this, including in “The Communist Exposed” by W. Cleon Skousen”, Marx was reported as a Jew, the son of a Jew, related to rich bankers like the Rothschilds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.