Italy’s Ministry of Health has placed heavy restrictions on the use of Monsanto’s ‘probably carcinogenic’ herbicide, Roundup.
Spraying of the active ingredient glyphosate has been banned in areas frequented by the public or by “vulnerable groups”
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
This includes gardens, courtyards, roadways, sports fields, recreational areas, playgrounds, green areas outside school buildings and other green spaces.
Additionally, pre-harvest desiccation, the process of spraying crops with glyphosate before harvesting, has also been banned, as has the non-agricultural use of glyphosate on soils composed of 80 percent or more of sand — a measure designed to protect groundwater from further agrichemical contamination.
All told, Italy has just adopted one of the largest bans on the agricultural and public use of glyphosate in country’s history.
Since Monsanto relies on sales of Roundup to prop up their seed monopoly (with 90 percent of all genetically-modified plants grown coming from their seed), the Italian Ministry’s decision to ban its use could portend a bleak future for the company in Europe. The Dutch have already banned glyphosate, with France and Brazil following in their footsteps. Roundup has already been pulled from the shelves of many gardening and DIY centers in all three countries.
Though the EU recently extended Monsanto’s license for Roundup for another eighteen months, just hours from implementing a total recall, political deadlock and questioned science don’t seem to be stopping the growing disdain for the product.
The Great Glyphosate Rebellion continues. Even a co-formulant, POE-tallowamine, which appears in Roundup is under heavy scrutiny after members of the European Parliament called it into question.
A recent and controversial study performed by Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini has pointed out that Roundup is even more toxic than previously suggested. Published in the highly-ranked scientific journal Toxicology, the professor and his team state:
… all the glyphosate-based herbicides tested are more toxic than glyphosate alone, and [this study] explains why. Thus their regulatory assessments and the maximum residue levels authorized in the environment, food, and feed, are erroneous. A drink (such as tap water contaminated by Roundup residues) or a food made with a Roundup tolerant GMO (like a transgenic soya or corn) were already demonstrated as toxic in the recent rat feeding study (2) from Prof. Séralini team. … These assessments are therefore neither neutral nor independent. They should as a first step make public on the Internet all the data that underpin the commercial release and positive opinions on the use of Roundup and similar products. The industry toxicological data must be legally made public.
The use of this product should be in serious question. As Séralini suggests,
“The regulatory authorization process for pesticides released into the environment and sold in stores must urgently be revised. Moreover, since the toxic confidential adjuvants are in general use in pesticide formulations, we fear according to these discoveries that the toxicity of all pesticides has been very significantly underestimated.
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- Donald Trump Calls For An End To Crazy War With Russia - January 26, 2023
- Parents Outraged After Finding Porn In Library At Wisconsin School - January 26, 2023
- Marjorie Taylor Greene Appointed To House Covid Subcommittee - January 26, 2023