Reputable scientists claim 9/11 was a controlled demolition job and building 7 is the Achilles’ heel of the official version of events.
The third building to fall at free fall speed on September 11, 2001, was WTC7.
It was not hit by a plane on 9/11 and yet imploded on itself at free fall speed like the other two towers, meaning that there was no resistance to its collapse, indicating a perfect demolition job by experts.
The building’s collapse was mistakenly reported by the media ahead of time, at a time when news channels were all clambering over themselves to read from the same hymn sheet.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The BBC managed to announce the collapse of the building before it happened, adding to the confusion of the day.
Fifteen years later, empirical evidence and the laws of physics are still being ignored while millions have lost their lives and the world is on the brink of war.
The third building was not even mentioned in the official 9/11 report.
WTC7 housed a command center and other important offices.
An alarm was sounded for rescue workers to evacuate the area prior to its collapse.
anonhq reports:
15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.
The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.
One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineers seriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.
Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993 report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.
In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:
“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”
As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.
It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:
“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”
—
10 Disturbing 9/11 Facts
Edmondo Burr
CEO
Assistant Editor
Latest posts by Edmondo Burr (see all)
- Police Arrest Suspect In Supermarket Baby Food Poisoning - October 1, 2017
- Seoul Secures Data From Electromagnetic Interference By N Korea - September 30, 2017
- The ‘World’s First Internet War’ Has Begun: Julian Assange - September 30, 2017
Oh well we know how to believe the paid scientists don’t we… It was a Terrorist Attack end of deal, so now go ahead and sue the pants off Saudi Arabia who financed the Jihad operations…
Interesting…you wouldn’t believe paid scientists, but you believe paid politicians, paid media, paid “expert witnesses”, and paid employees/law enforcement. In case you still don’t understand – everyone is PAID – right down to the individual interviews.
LMAO,you are the epitome of stupidity and being naïve..If there were ever an expert or experts to listen to when it comes to things like science,physics,etc then it should be these guys who are professional experts and highly credentialed…And why would the US have CLASSIFIED 28 pages of the 9/11 commission report if there was no US involvement? Who was real cozy with the Saudis? Bush..Are you that dumb downed that you cant see it was explosives that brought down all 3 wtc towers on 9/11?? you don’t even have to be an engineer or scientist to see that building 7 was a classic controlled demolition…
The CLASSIFIED 28 pages ,tells us a lot ” the lives of 3000 people is worth less to them than the arms &oil trade with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia .
How would anyone rig these buildings for demolition without anyone noticing, and leaving no trace behind?
Several weeks before the towers fell there were people working on the elevators at night and left charges.
It’s goes deeper then that and if you look on pilots for 911 they have it all listed!
listen to “another 19” series on http://gunsandbutter.com the guest does an excellent job pointing out what companies were in play, who were running them, and what other actions these people have taken. It’s effing incredible.
The last couple of paragraphs illustrate the absurdity of the whole article, because the WTC buildings weren’t steel frame buildings. They had a steel reinforced concrete central core from which bar joists extended to the outside steel curtain wall.
Especially since it takes weeks to prep even a modest building for demo.
Where are the planes? Clearly WTC7 was up when reporter said it was down
WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY!
Never mind this smoke and mirrors decoy of Saudi Arabia. There’s a wealth of evidence for it being a neo-Con / Zionist cabal in the State Department.
Who benefited from these attacks because it certainly hasn’t been any Arab or Muslim nations.
Netanyahu described 9/11 as “a good thing.” Of course it is a good thing in his eyes. He’s succeeded in getting his useful puppets in Washington to decimate the Middle East as a prelude to Israeli expansion.
This farcical myth about Saudis hijacking planes that they couldn’t even fly, and executing manoeuvres that skilled pilots have admitted they themselves couldn’t carry out, is beyond ridicule. These people, who couldn’t fly a single engined Cessna , supposedly circumvented the security of the most security minded nation on earth , and there were no military jets to intercept them . Just think about that for a second.
You only have to read a US Government paper called Rebuilding America’s Defences : Project for a New America Century, or what is commonly known as the PNAC document, written in the 1990s to see that this had been planned well in advance in both Tel Aviv and Washington. On page 51 it states that in order to manufacture the consent of the public for endless wars in the Middle East it would be necessary to have “a catalysing event such as another Pearl Harbor.”
So there is the planning of contrived terrorism written by a lobby of neo-Conservatives, many with dual Israeli nationality.
All roads lead to Washington and Tel Aviv . If anyone still believes this Saudi canard they’re being played like Daniel Barenboim’s Steinway.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
gotta love the disclaimer: http://www.eujournal.org/files/journals/1/documents/Disclaimer.ESJ.pdf
Also, why didn’t they just link to Europhysics (http://www.europhysicsnews.org/), the actual journal to which their link on the article takes you?
What ever it was, was a tragedy and who ever did it still a mystery and always will be.
http://eujournal.org/files/journals/1/documents/Disclaimer.ESJ.pdf