Maine Supreme Judicial Court (the State’s highest court) has ruled that children can be forced to receive vaccinations against their parents wishes.
The court ordered the state’s Department of Health and Human Services to vaccinate a child, against the wishes of the mother, who says she does “not believe in viruses”.
The child – who, along with the mother, was not identified in the case – had been taken into temporary state custody because of concerns that the mother’s continued relationship with the 1-year-old’s father put the child’s safety at risk, the court said.
The mother chose not to vaccinate her child “based on her refusal to accept scientific facts” and didn’t give the child antibiotics because she believes that the “mind can cure all,” the ruling said.
The justices said the department was correct to take the child into custody, arguing that there was sufficient evidence that the child was in jeopardy at the home. Furthermore, they said that the department has the right to make medical decisions, including those related to vaccinations, when it has custody of that child.
Erika Bristol, an attorney for the mother, said she’s not sure what action her client will take next. Bristol said the mother believes that people should be allowed to hold their own views on health care without being punished.
“People are allowed to have opinions that aren’t supported by science in other issues,” she said. “But apparently in Maine that is not the case with vaccinations.”
A spokesman for DHHS declined to comment on the decision Friday.
Justice Joseph Jabar dissented, noting that Maine law allows parents to forgo vaccinating their children for personal and religious reasons. He said the decision to disregard the mother’s views on vaccinations effectively terminates her parental rights.
“It is not up to us to determine whether the law giving the parents the right to opt out of vaccinations is wise or medically sound – the Legislature has given parents this right,” Jabar said. “If the department wants to vaccinate the child immediately over the parent’s objection, it should request a hearing and convince the court by clear and convincing evidence that this statutory parental right should be terminated.”
Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)
- Prince Andrew REFUSING to Cooperate in FBI’s Elite Child Sex Probe - January 28, 2020
- Hundreds of Trump Supporters Line up 24 Hours Early to See POTUS in New Jersey - January 28, 2020
- RIGGED! Mainstream Networks BLACK OUT During Pam Bondi’s Exposure of Biden Corruption - January 28, 2020